248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22855508)
1. Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.
Rogers R; Gillard ND; Wooley CN; Kelsey KR
Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22855508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.
Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD
Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The detection of feigned disabilities: the effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory in a traumatized inpatient sample.
Rogers R; Gillard ND; Wooley CN; Ross CA
Assessment; 2012 Mar; 19(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 21954300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the disorder matter? Investigating a moderating effect on coached noncredible overreporting using the MMPI-2 and PAI.
Veltri CO; Williams JE
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 23118265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The SIMS Screen for feigned mental disorders: the development of detection-based scales.
Rogers R; Robinson EV; Gillard ND
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 25060144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of feigned mental disorders on the personality assessment inventory: a discriminant analysis.
Rogers R; Sewell KW; Morey LC; Ustad KL
J Pers Assess; 1996 Dec; 67(3):629-40. PubMed ID: 8938398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles.
Hopwood CJ; Talbert CA; Morey LC; Rogers R
J Clin Psychol; 2008 Mar; 64(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 18302214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malingering on the Personality Assessment Inventory: identification of specific feigned disorders.
Hopwood CJ; Morey LC; Rogers R; Sewell K
J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17266413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of traumatic brain injury symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory: an analogue study.
Keiski MA; Shore DL; Hamilton JM; Malec JF
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):233-47. PubMed ID: 24965838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review.
Hawes SW; Boccaccini MT
Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):112-24. PubMed ID: 19290771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and initial validation of a scale for detecting inconsistent responding on the personality assessment inventory-short form.
Siefert CJ; Stein M; Sinclair SJ; Antonius D; Shiva A; Blais MA
J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 22574923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried ED; Hudson BL; Vitacco MJ; Carbonell JL
Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):232-243. PubMed ID: 26423350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings.
Rogers R; Sewell KW; Cruise KR; Wang EW; Ustad KL
Assessment; 1998 Dec; 5(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 9835663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of the Malingering Discriminant Function Index for the MMPI-2.
Bacchiochi JR; Bagby RM
J Pers Assess; 2006 Aug; 87(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16856786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feigning specific disorders: a study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).
Rogers R; Ornduff SR; Sewell KW
J Pers Assess; 1993 Jun; 60(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 8336269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning.
Bagby RM; Nicholson RA; Bacchiochi JR; Ryder AG; Bury AS
J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 11936213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.
Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feigned Adjudicative Incompetence.
Rogers R; Robinson EV; Henry SA
Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 26384736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
