BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22856260)

  • 1. Current trends in breast reduction.
    Roje Z; Roje Z; Milosević M; Varvodić J; Mance M
    Coll Antropol; 2012 Jun; 36(2):657-68. PubMed ID: 22856260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty using an inferior dermal pedicle or a central pedicle.
    Cho BC; Yang JD; Baik BS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 18037359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective outcome study of 106 cases of vertical mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and breast reduction.
    Swanson E
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jul; 66(7):937-49. PubMed ID: 23582506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superior and superomedial pedicle wise-pattern reduction mammaplasty: maximizing cosmesis and minimizing complications.
    McCulley SJ; Schaverien MV
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19542877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparison of long-term outcome of 6 techniques of breast reduction].
    Tairych G; Worseg A; Kuzbari R; Deutinger M; Holle J
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2000 May; 32(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10929553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
    Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical reduction mammaplasty combined with a superomedial pedicle in gigantomastia.
    Amini P; Stasch T; Theodorou P; Altintas AA; Phan V; Spilker G
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Mar; 64(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 20179473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Weight variation after reduction mammary surgery: retrospective study of 100 cases].
    Viard R; Bouguila J; Brun A; Voulliaume D; Comparin JP; Foyatier JL
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2012 Feb; 57(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21093971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast-feeding, self-exam, and exercise practices before and after reduction mammoplasty.
    Brown JR; Holton LH; Chung TL; Slezak S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Oct; 61(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 18812705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
    Gurunluoglu R; Gurunluoglu A; Williams SA; Tebockhorst S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 21862916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and complication rates in cosmetic breast surgery.
    Hanemann MS; Grotting JC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 20395806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical scar versus the inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty: a 10-year follow-up.
    Bouwer LR; van der Biezen JJ; Spronk CA; van der Lei B
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1298-304. PubMed ID: 22658727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing breast projection with combined free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty and back-folded dermaglandular inferior pedicle.
    Gorgu M; Ayhan M; Aytug Z; Aksungur E; Demirdover C
    Breast J; 2007; 13(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17461895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the LeJour and Wise pattern methods of breast reduction.
    Kreithen J; Caffee H; Rosenberg J; Chin G; Clayman M; Lawson M; Seagle MB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):236-41; discussion 241-2. PubMed ID: 15725821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Breast-reduction surgery--a long-term survey of indications and outcomes].
    Kneser U; Jaeger K; Bach AD; Polykandriotis E; Ohnolz J; Kopp J; Horch RE
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Oct; 146(42):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 15536703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of unilateral giant fibroadenoma by breast reduction skin incision: the inverted "T" technique.
    Achebe JU; Njeze GE; Okwesili OR
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 24326806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty.
    Hamdi M; Greuse M; De Mey A; Webster MH
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11121316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tissue expansion after inverted-T mammaplasty: can it be performed successfully?
    Kilgo MS; Cordeiro PG; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 50(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 12783005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The vertical reduction mammaplasty: a prospective analysis of patient outcomes.
    Spector JA; Kleinerman R; Culliford AT; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Feb; 117(2):374-81; discussion 382-3. PubMed ID: 16462315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.