These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22856471)

  • 1. GA(M)E-QSAR: a novel, fully automatic genetic-algorithm-(meta)-ensembles approach for binary classification in ligand-based drug design.
    Pérez-Castillo Y; Lazar C; Taminau J; Froeyen M; Cabrera-Pérez MÁ; Nowé A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Sep; 52(9):2366-86. PubMed ID: 22856471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ligand-based virtual screening and in silico design of new antimalarial compounds using nonstochastic and stochastic total and atom-type quadratic maps.
    Marrero-Ponce Y; Iyarreta-Veitía M; Montero-Torres A; Romero-Zaldivar C; Brandt CA; Avila PE; Kirchgatter K; Machado Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1082-100. PubMed ID: 16045304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of mutual information and genetic programming for feature selection in QSAR.
    Venkatraman V; Dalby AR; Yang ZR
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15446827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of MLR, PLS and GA-MLR in QSAR analysis.
    Saxena AK; Prathipati P
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003; 14(5-6):433-45. PubMed ID: 14758986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial least squares modeling and genetic algorithm optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hasegawa K; Funatsu K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2000; 11(3-4):189-209. PubMed ID: 10969871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 4D-QSAR analysis and pharmacophore modeling: electron conformational-genetic algorithm approach for penicillins.
    Yanmaz E; Sarıpınar E; Şahin K; Geçen N; Çopur F
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 19(7):2199-210. PubMed ID: 21419636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
    Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.
    Mahasenan KV; Li C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1345-55. PubMed ID: 22540736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential diagnosis of CT focal liver lesions using texture features, feature selection and ensemble driven classifiers.
    Mougiakakou SG; Valavanis IK; Nikita A; Nikita KS
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17624744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From activity cliffs to target-specific scoring models and pharmacophore hypotheses.
    Seebeck B; Wagener M; Rarey M
    ChemMedChem; 2011 Sep; 6(9):1630-9, 1533. PubMed ID: 21751401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ESVM: evolutionary support vector machine for automatic feature selection and classification of microarray data.
    Huang HL; Chang FL
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):516-28. PubMed ID: 17280775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual screening data fusion using both structure- and ligand-based methods.
    Svensson F; Karlén A; Sköld C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 22148635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ensemble of linear models for predicting drug properties.
    Arodź T; Yuen DA; Dudek AZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 16426075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fragment-similarity-based QSAR (FS-QSAR) algorithm for ligand biological activity predictions.
    Myint KZ; Ma C; Wang L; Xie XQ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Jun; 22(3):385-410. PubMed ID: 21598200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening.
    Prathipati P; Saxena AK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 16426038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the validity of a QSAR model--a classification approach.
    Guha R; Jurs PC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 15667130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ensemble bridge algorithm: a new modeling tool for drug discovery problems.
    Culp M; Johnson K; Michailidis G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 20121044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition.
    Lemmen C; Lengauer T; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 1998 Nov; 41(23):4502-20. PubMed ID: 9804690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of ensemble pruning techniques based on ordered aggregation.
    Martínez-Muñoz G; Hernández-Lobato D; Suárez A
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Feb; 31(2):245-59. PubMed ID: 19110491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.