BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22856507)

  • 1. Methods for evaluating cervical range of motion in trauma settings.
    Voss S; Page M; Benger J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2012 Aug; 20():50. PubMed ID: 22856507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The measurement of tissue interface pressures and changes in jugular venous parameters associated with cervical immobilisation devices: a systematic review.
    Sparke A; Voss S; Benger J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 21():81. PubMed ID: 24299024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 'Necksafe' head articulation control system: a novel cervical immobilisation device.
    Sparke A; Torlei K; Voss S; Page M; Benger J; Matthews E; Hillman M; Hart D; McLaughlin E; Carter J; Harris N
    Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 25092798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extrication collars can result in abnormal separation between vertebrae in the presence of a dissociative injury.
    Ben-Galim P; Dreiangel N; Mattox KL; Reitman CA; Kalantar SB; Hipp JA
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 20093981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of cervical trauma collars: differences in immobilization, effect on jugular venous pressure and patient comfort.
    Karason S; Reynisson K; Sigvaldason K; Sigurdsson GH
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 22():37. PubMed ID: 24906207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning the lessons from conflict: pre-hospital cervical spine stabilisation following ballistic neck trauma.
    Ramasamy A; Midwinter M; Mahoney P; Clasper J
    Injury; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 19616210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prehospital Cervical Spine Motion: Immobilization Versus Spine Motion Restriction.
    Swartz EE; Tucker WS; Nowak M; Roberto J; Hollingworth A; Decoster LC; Trimarco TW; Mihalik JP
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(5):630-636. PubMed ID: 29452031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Cervical Collars on Intracranial Pressure Values in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
    Núñez-Patiño RA; Rubiano AM; Godoy DA
    Neurocrit Care; 2020 Apr; 32(2):469-477. PubMed ID: 31190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the novel lateral trauma position cause more motion in an unstable cervical spine injury than the logroll maneuver?
    Hyldmo PK; Horodyski M; Conrad BP; Aslaksen S; Røislien J; Prasarn M; Rechtine GR; Søreide E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1630-1635. PubMed ID: 28511807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel helmet-mounted device for reducing the potential of catastrophic cervical spine fractures and spinal cord injuries in head-first impacts.
    Dressler DM; Dennison CR; Whyte T; Cripton PA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Apr; 64():22-27. PubMed ID: 29724412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review.
    Pandor A; Essat M; Sutton A; Fuller G; Reid S; Smith JE; Fothergill R; Surendra Kumar D; Kolias A; Hutchinson P; Perkins GD; Wilson MH; Lecky F
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0302127. PubMed ID: 38662734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model.
    Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; DiPaola MJ; Conrad BP; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19333100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvised vs Standard Cervical Collar to Restrict Spine Movement in the Backcountry Environment.
    Porter A; Difrancesca M; Slack S; Hudecek L; McIntosh SE
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 31706730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.
    Hostler D; Colburn D; Seitz SR
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 19291567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spinal orthoses.
    Agabegi SS; Asghar FA; Herkowitz HN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2010 Nov; 18(11):657-67. PubMed ID: 21041800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion in the unstable cervical spine during hospital bed transfers.
    Conrad BP; Rechtine G; Weight M; Clarke J; Horodyski M
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):432-6. PubMed ID: 20699754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Head-Neck Motion in Prehospital Trauma Patients under Spinal Motion Restriction: A Pilot Study.
    McDonald N; Kriellaars D; Weldon E; Pryce R
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2021; 25(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 32045315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.