342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22857130)
1. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
Sathre R; Masanet E
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of fuel-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for Fischer-Tropsch diesel from coal and cellulosic biomass.
Xie X; Wang M; Han J
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3047-53. PubMed ID: 21370852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emissions and temperature benefits: The role of wind power in China.
Duan H
Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 152():342-350. PubMed ID: 27499131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coping with carbon: a near-term strategy to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power stations.
Breeze P
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Nov; 366(1882):3891-900. PubMed ID: 18757277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-carbon electricity generation-based dynamic equilibrium strategy for carbon dioxide emissions reduction in the coal-fired power enterprise.
Xu J; Feng Q; Lv C; Huang Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):36732-36753. PubMed ID: 31741269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.
Fleishman LA; De Bruin WB; Morgan MG
Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1399-410. PubMed ID: 20561264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Humidity Swing Direct Air Capture of CO
van der Giesen C; Meinrenken CJ; Kleijn R; Sprecher B; Lackner KS; Kramer GJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(2):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 27935700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
