These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22857798)

  • 1. No own-age bias in 3-year-old children: more evidence for the role of early experience in building face-processing biases.
    Macchi Cassia V; Pisacane A; Gava L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Nov; 113(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 22857798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 21213196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age biases in face processing: the effects of experience across development.
    Macchi Cassia V
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):816-29. PubMed ID: 21988386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A developmental study of the own-age face recognition bias in children.
    Hills PJ
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 48(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 22182298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attractiveness judgments and discrimination of mommies and grandmas: perceptual tuning for young adult faces.
    Short LA; Mondloch CJ; Hackland AT
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Jan; 129():1-11. PubMed ID: 25222629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults.
    Kuefner D; Macchi Cassia V; Picozzi M; Bricolo E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):811-7. PubMed ID: 18665727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of spatial frequency biases in face recognition.
    Leonard HC; Karmiloff-Smith A; Johnson MH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Aug; 106(4):193-207. PubMed ID: 20451214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study.
    Wiese H
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 22008365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to spacing changes in faces and nonface objects in preschool-aged children and adults.
    Macchi Cassia V; Turati C; Schwarzer G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 21477815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early experience predicts later plasticity for face processing: evidence for the reactivation of dormant effects.
    Cassia VM; Kuefner D; Picozzi M; Vescovo E
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jul; 20(7):853-9. PubMed ID: 19493318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect.
    de Heering A; Houthuys S; Rossion B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jan; 96(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 17007869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's perceptions of and beliefs about facial maturity.
    Gross TF
    J Genet Psychol; 2004 Mar; 165(1):81-97. PubMed ID: 15101553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: evidence from the composite effect.
    Cassia VM; Picozzi M; Kuefner D; Bricolo E; Turati C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Mar; 12(2):236-48. PubMed ID: 19143797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H; Stahl J; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect.
    Laguesse R; Dormal G; Biervoye A; Kuefner D; Rossion B
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):14. PubMed ID: 23019119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The left perceptual bias for adult and infant faces in adults and 5-year-old children: face age matters.
    Proietti V; Pavone S; Ricciardelli P; Macchi Cassia V
    Laterality; 2015; 20(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 24779399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.