459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22857857)
1. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion.
De Brabandere M; Hoskin P; Haustermans K; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Aug; 104(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 22857857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT- and MRI-based seed localization in postimplant evaluation after prostate brachytherapy.
De Brabandere M; Al-Qaisieh B; De Wever L; Haustermans K; Kirisits C; Moerland MA; Oyen R; Rijnders A; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 23876358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of CT and MR-CT fusion for prostate post-implant dosimetry.
Maletz KL; Ennis RD; Ostenson J; Pevsner A; Kagen A; Wernick I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1912-7. PubMed ID: 21550183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of MRI-based postimplant dosimetric assessment in prostate brachytherapy using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.
Ohashi T; Momma T; Yamashita S; Nagatsuma K; Kanai K; Kitagawa K; Takahashi S; Hanada T; Yorozu A; Shigematsu N
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 22330102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Watanabe K; Katayama N; Katsui K; Matsushita T; Takamoto A; Ihara H; Nasu Y; Takemoto M; Kuroda M; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):483-489. PubMed ID: 31083713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Bowes D; Crook JM; Araujo C; Batchelar D
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22727473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of CT- and radiograph-based post-implant dosimetry for transperineal 125I prostate brachytherapy using single seeds and a commercial treatment-planning software.
Siebert FA; Kohr P; Kovács G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb; 182(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 16447016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: a dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases.
Fuller DB; Jin H; Koziol JA; Feng AC
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 16182221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive I-125 multi-seed comparison for prostate brachytherapy: dosimetry and visibility analysis.
Al-Qaisieh B; Smith DW; Brearley E; St Clair S; Bownes P
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 17588696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation.
Lindsay PE; Van Dyk J; Battista JJ
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1897-908. PubMed ID: 12906208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of combined x-ray radiography and magnetic resonance (XMR) imaging-versus computed tomography-based dosimetry for the evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants.
Acher P; Rhode K; Morris S; Gaya A; Miquel M; Popert R; Tham I; Nichol J; McLeish K; Deehan C; Dasgupta P; Beaney R; Keevil SF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1518-25. PubMed ID: 18513881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Changes in target volumes definition by using MRI for prostate bed radiotherapy planning--preliminary results].
Sefrová J; Paluska ; Odrázka K; Belobradek Z; Hoffmann P; Prosvic P; Brod'ák M; Louda M; Macingová Z; Vosmik M
Klin Onkol; 2010; 23(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 20806824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use and uncertainties of mutual information for computed tomography/ magnetic resonance (CT/MR) registration post permanent implant of the prostate.
Roberson PL; McLaughlin PW; Narayana V; Troyer S; Hixson GV; Kessler ML
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 15789594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic segmentation of pelvic structures from magnetic resonance images for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Pasquier D; Lacornerie T; Vermandel M; Rousseau J; Lartigau E; Betrouni N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jun; 68(2):592-600. PubMed ID: 17498571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 3 different postimplant dosimetry methods following permanent 125I prostate seed brachytherapy.
Marcu LG; Gowda R
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 23611630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
