213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22858703)
1. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth.
Nogourani MK; Janghorbani M; Khadem P; Jadidi Z; Jalali S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 22858703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop.
Feigal RJ; Quelhas I
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 14579879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Follow-up of a Fissure Sealant Placed Using Different Adhesive Protocols: A 24-month Split-mouth Study.
Yazici AR; Bayazit EO; Kutuk ZB; Ozgunaltay G; Ergin E; Berber A
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):362-371. PubMed ID: 29630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of successful outcome of pit and fissure sealants bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive and self-etch adhesive system.
Baloch JM; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Younus MZ; Nasim MO; Rashid S
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(5):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 34180435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 48-month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed with different adhesive systems.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Tuncer D; Firat E; Unluer S; Baseren M
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 23210859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the intermediary layer on sealant retention: a randomized 24-month clinical trial.
Moreira KMS; Kantovitz KR; Aguiar JPD; Borges AFS; Pascon FM; Puppin-Rontani RM
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1435-1443. PubMed ID: 27392611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
Khare M; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing.
Gomes-Silva JM; Torres CP; Contente MM; Oliveira MA; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19180325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro.
Cehreli ZC; Gungor HC
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19058684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A two-year clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in teenagers.
Yazici AR; Kiremitçi A; Celik C; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 137(10):1401-5. PubMed ID: 17012719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants.
Symons AL; Chu CY; Meyers IA
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Dec; 23(12):791-8. PubMed ID: 8971640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.
Lygidakis NA; Dimou G; Stamataki E
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 19995506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the effect of one-step self etching adhesives applied in pit and fissure sealing].
Su HR; Xu PC; Qian WH
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 27609386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.
Althomali YM; Musa S; Manan NM; Nor NAM
Pediatr Dent; 2022 Jul; 44(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 35999682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth.
Maher MM; Elkashlan HI; El-Housseiny AA
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 23930635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of an adhesive used as a fissure sealant.
Grande RH; de Lima AC; Rodrigues Filho LE; Witzel MF
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 11763924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
