These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. General state contrast imaging: an optimized polarimetric imaging modality insensitive to spatial intensity fluctuations. Anna G; Goudail F; Dolfi D J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Jun; 29(6):892-900. PubMed ID: 22673418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal discrimination of multiple regions with an active polarimetric imager. Anna G; Goudail F; Dolfi D Opt Express; 2011 Dec; 19(25):25367-78. PubMed ID: 22273928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal configuration of static Mueller imagers for target detection. Goudail F; Boffety M; Roussel S J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jun; 34(6):1054-1062. PubMed ID: 29036090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the influence of noise statistics on polarimetric contrast optimization. Anna G; Goudail F; Chavel P; Dolfi D Appl Opt; 2012 Mar; 51(8):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22410999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review. Qi J; Elson DS J Biophotonics; 2017 Aug; 10(8):950-982. PubMed ID: 28464464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of speckle on APSCI method and Mueller Imaging. Upadhyay D; Richert M; Lacot E; De Martino A; Orlik X Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 19(5):4553-9. PubMed ID: 21369287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real time complete Stokes polarimetric imager based on a linear polarizer array camera for tissue polarimetric imaging. Qi J; He C; Elson DS Biomed Opt Express; 2017 Nov; 8(11):4933-4946. PubMed ID: 29188092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polarimetric target detection in the presence of spatially fluctuating Mueller matrices. Anna G; Goudail F; Dolfi D Opt Lett; 2011 Dec; 36(23):4590-2. PubMed ID: 22139252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving target discrimination ability of active polarization imagers by spectral broadening. Thomas L; Boffety M; Goudail F Opt Express; 2015 Dec; 23(26):33514-28. PubMed ID: 26832016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal configuration of static polarization imagers for target detection. Goudail F; Boffety M J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Jan; 33(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26831580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biosensors technologies: acousto-optic tunable filter-based hyperspectral and polarization imagers for fluorescence and spectroscopic imaging. Gupta N Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 503():293-305. PubMed ID: 19151948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full analytical solution of Adapted Polarisation State Contrast Imaging. Upadhyay D; Mondal S; Lacot E; Orlik X Opt Express; 2011 Dec; 19(25):25188-98. PubMed ID: 22273910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mueller matrix polarimetry with 3D integral imaging. Carnicer A; Bosch S; Javidi B Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(8):11525-11536. PubMed ID: 31052996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of imaging geometry and noise model on polarimetric contrast optimization. Dai J; Boffety M; Goudail F Appl Opt; 2019 Mar; 58(8):2100-2111. PubMed ID: 30874077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complex Spatial Illumination Scheme Optimization of Backscattering Mueller Matrix Polarimetry for Tissue Imaging and Biosensing. Jiao W; Zhang Z; Zeng N; Hao R; He H; He C; Ma H Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38667201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental validation of optimum input polarization states for Mueller matrix determination with a dual photoelastic modulator polarimeter. Gribble A; Layden D; Vitkin IA Opt Lett; 2013 Dec; 38(24):5272-5. PubMed ID: 24322235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]