These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22859761)

  • 1. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficiency of genome-wide selection for genetic improvement of net merit.
    Togashi K; Lin CY; Yamazaki T
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2972-80. PubMed ID: 21512116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain.
    Buch LH; Sørensen MK; Berg P; Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Apr; 129(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 22394236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic selection using beef commercial carcass phenotypes.
    Todd DL; Roughsedge T; Woolliams JA
    Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 24345570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.