These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2286194)

  • 1. The effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Smith T; Deakin J; Surgenor B
    Ergonomics; 1990 Dec; 33(12):1455-69. PubMed ID: 2286194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of factor-score-based models to explain and predict maximal box-lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Deakin J; Smith T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 7895736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic analysis of isoinertial lifting technique.
    Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; French SL; Greenhorn DR; Andrew GM; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 28080938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jan; 54(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 21181590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of an on-body personal lift assist device (PLAD) on fatigue during a repetitive lifting task.
    Lotz CA; Agnew MJ; Godwin AA; Stevenson JM
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 18055220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender differences in performance of a selection test using the incremental lifting machine.
    Stevenson JM; Greenhorn DR; Bryant JT; Deakin JM; Smith JT
    Appl Ergon; 1996 Feb; 27(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15676311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oxygen consumption prediction models for individual and combination materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG; Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1776-89. PubMed ID: 18941980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of manual materials handling: biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions.
    Gündogdu O; Anderson KS; Parnianpour M
    Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 15706064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lifting capacity of workers.
    Ayoub MM
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 6(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 617654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posture stress on firefighters and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) associated with repetitive reaching, bending, lifting, and pulling tasks.
    Gentzler M; Stader S
    Work; 2010; 37(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 20978330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling of shoulder and torso perception of effort in manual transfer tasks.
    Kim KH; Martin B; Chaffin D
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jul; 47(9):927-44. PubMed ID: 15204271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.