These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2286194)

  • 21. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximum isoinertial lifting capabilities for different lifting ranges and container dimensions.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 15854581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Principal component analysis of lifting waveforms.
    Wrigley AT; Albert WJ; Deluzio KJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 16524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human strength capabilities during one-handed maximum voluntary exertions in the fore and aft plane.
    Fothergill DM; Grieve DW; Pheasant ST
    Ergonomics; 1991 May; 34(5):563-73. PubMed ID: 1884710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity.
    Curtis L; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Feb; 19(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 8178226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relating heart rate and rate of perceived exertion in two simulated occupational tasks.
    MacKinnon SN
    Ergonomics; 1999 May; 42(5):761-6. PubMed ID: 10327895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electromyography of the thigh muscles during lifting tasks in kneeling and squatting postures.
    Gallagher S; Pollard J; Porter WL
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jan; 54(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 21181592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.
    Jacobs I; Bell DG; Pope J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1988; 57(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 3349979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills.
    Newmark J; Dandolu V; Milner R; Grewal H; Harbison S; Hernandez E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):546.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17980205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychophysical frequency and sustained exertion at varying wrist postures for a drilling task.
    Marley RJ; Fernandez JE
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):303-25. PubMed ID: 7895737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of exercise load and blood-flow restriction on skeletal muscle function.
    Cook SB; Clark BC; Ploutz-Snyder LL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Oct; 39(10):1708-13. PubMed ID: 17909396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1050-9. PubMed ID: 9674377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical differences between expert and novice workers in a manual material handling task.
    Plamondon A; Denis D; Delisle A; Lariviere C; Salazar E;
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1239-53. PubMed ID: 20865607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling of functional trunk muscle performance: interfacing ergonomics and spine rehabilitation in response to the ADA.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Simon SR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Oct; 34(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 9323649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Manual handling performance: the effects of menstrual cycle phase.
    Birch KM; Reilly T
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1317-32. PubMed ID: 10582502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not.
    Wrigley AT; Albert WJ; Deluzio KJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 15698697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.