831 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22862909)
1. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates.
Cobo A; Castellò D; Vallejo B; Albert C; de los Santos JM; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1623-30. PubMed ID: 23415972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
Kahraman S; Candan ZN
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blastocyst culture and cryopreservation to optimize clinical outcomes of warming cycles.
Zhu L; Xi Q; Zhang H; Li Y; Ai J; Jin L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Aug; 27(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23769665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases?
Stern JE; Lieberman ES; Macaluso M; Racowsky C
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):890-3. PubMed ID: 22265032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program.
García JI; Noriega-Portella L; Noriega-Hoces L
Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):782-90. PubMed ID: 21303777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
