208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22862935)
1. Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience.
Giguere A; Légaré F; Grad R; Pluye P; Haynes RB; Cauchon M; Rousseau F; Alvarez Argote J; Labrecque M
Implement Sci; 2012 Aug; 7():72. PubMed ID: 22862935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing and user-testing Decision boxes to facilitate shared decision making in primary care--a study protocol.
Giguere A; Legare F; Grad R; Pluye P; Rousseau F; Haynes RB; Cauchon M; Labrecque M
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Mar; 11():17. PubMed ID: 21385470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study.
Giguere AM; Labrecque M; Haynes RB; Grad R; Pluye P; Légaré F; Cauchon M; Greenway M; Carmichael PH
Implement Sci; 2014 Oct; 9():144. PubMed ID: 25280742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol.
Giguere A; Labrecque M; Grad R; Cauchon M; Greenway M; Légaré F; Pluye P; Turcotte S; Dolovich L; Haynes RB
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Aug; 12():85. PubMed ID: 22867107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility.
Bonner C; Fajardo MA; Doust J; McCaffery K; Trevena L
Implement Sci; 2019 Aug; 14(1):86. PubMed ID: 31466526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing a two-sided intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in haemophilia: decision boxes for clinicians and patient decision aids for patients.
Athale A; Giguere A; Barbara A; Krassova S; Iorio A
Haemophilia; 2014 Nov; 20(6):800-6. PubMed ID: 25273544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer patients' perspective on shared decision-making and decision aids in oncology.
Josfeld L; Keinki C; Pammer C; Zomorodbakhsch B; Hübner J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Jun; 147(6):1725-1732. PubMed ID: 33682014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making.
Ankolekar A; Vanneste BGL; Bloemen-van Gurp E; van Roermund JG; van Limbergen EJ; van de Beek K; Marcelissen T; Zambon V; Oelke M; Dekker A; Roumen C; Lambin P; Berlanga A; Fijten R
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jul; 19(1):130. PubMed ID: 31296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
Holmes-Rovner M; Montgomery JS; Rovner DR; Scherer LD; Whitfield J; Kahn VC; Merkle EC; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26304063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.
Milton S; Macrae F; McIntosh JG; Saya S; Alphonse P; Yogaparan T; Karnchanachari N; Novy K; Nguyen P; Lau P; Emery J
Fam Pract; 2024 Jun; 41(3):349-359. PubMed ID: 37058423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers and facilitators to the dissemination of DECISION+, a continuing medical education program for optimizing decisions about antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: a study protocol.
Allaire AS; Labrecque M; Giguère A; Gagnon MP; Grimshaw J; Légaré F
Implement Sci; 2011 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 21214919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. If you build it, will they come? A qualitative evaluation of the use of video-based decision aids in primary care.
Newsome A; Sieber W; Smith M; Lillie D
Fam Med; 2012 Jan; 44(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 22241338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.
Yu CH; Ke C; Jovicic A; Hall S; Straus SE;
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Sep; 19(1):186. PubMed ID: 31533828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptance of shared decision making with reference to an electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) and its association to decision making in patients: an evaluation study.
Hirsch O; Keller H; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N
Implement Sci; 2011 Jul; 6():70. PubMed ID: 21736724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.
Wackerbarth SB; Tarasenko YN; Joyce JM; Haist SA
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 17098393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arriba-lib: association of an evidence-based electronic library of decision aids with communication and decision-making in patients and primary care physicians.
Hirsch O; Keller H; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Mar; 10(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 22405418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.
Boivin A; Légaré F; Gagnon MP
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Apr; 13(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18416912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shared decision-making--transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Dolan JG
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 18760559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a model for field-testing patient decision-support technologies: a qualitative field-testing study.
Evans R; Elwyn G; Edwards A; Watson E; Austoker J; Grol R
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jul; 9(3):e21. PubMed ID: 17627930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
