445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22862982)
21. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET dosimeter for electron backscatter using the GEANT4 code.
Chow JC; Leung MK
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2383-90. PubMed ID: 18649471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High correlation between radiation dose estimates for 256-slice CT obtained by highly parallelized hybrid Monte Carlo computation and solid-state metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor measurements in physical anthropomorphic phantoms.
Prinsen P; Trattner S; Wiegert J; Gerland EL; Shefer E; Morton T; Thompson CM; Cheng B; Halliburton SS; Einstein AJ
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5216-5226. PubMed ID: 31442300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Skeletal dosimetry in cone beam computed tomography.
Walters BR; Ding GX; Kramer R; Kawrakow I
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2915-22. PubMed ID: 19673190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging.
Neisius A; Wang AJ; Wang C; Nguyen G; Tsivian M; Kuntz NJ; Astroza GM; Lowry C; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Ferrandino MN; Lipkin ME
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2117-23. PubMed ID: 23764073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose distribution of ICRP adult reference computational phantoms for acquisitions with a 320 detector-row cone-beam CT scanner.
Salvadó M; Cros M; Joemai RM; Calzado A; Geleijns J
Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25964128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry of Kodak 9000 Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Yepes JF; Booe MR; Sanders BJ; Jones JE; Ehrlich Y; Ludlow JB; Johnson B
Pediatr Dent; 2017 May; 39(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 28583248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.
Emigh B; Gordon CL; Connolly BL; Falkiner M; Thomas KE
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1108-16. PubMed ID: 23529628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeter angular dependence in three rotational axes measured free-in-air and in soft-tissue equivalent material.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
J Radiat Res; 2013 Sep; 54(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 23520268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comprehensive evaluations of cone-beam CT dose in image-guided radiation therapy via GPU-based Monte Carlo simulations.
Montanari D; Scolari E; Silvestri C; Graves YJ; Yan H; Cervino L; Rice R; Jiang SB; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(5):1239-53. PubMed ID: 24556699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients.
Yeh JK; Chen CH
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):131. PubMed ID: 30075771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses.
Prins R; Dauer LT; Colosi DC; Quinn B; Kleiman NJ; Bohle GC; Holohan B; Al-Najjar A; Fernandez T; Bonvento M; Faber RD; Ching H; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21802322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo simulations of organ and effective doses and dose-length product for dental cone-beam CT.
Terashima S; Sano J; Osanai M; Toshima K; Ohuchi K; Hosokawa Y
Oral Radiol; 2024 Jan; 40(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 37597068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]