314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22863112)
1. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
Goi C; Little P; Xie C
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustered ChIP-Seq-defined transcription factor binding sites and histone modifications map distinct classes of regulatory elements.
Rye M; Sætrom P; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
BMC Biol; 2011 Nov; 9():80. PubMed ID: 22115494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.
Schmidt F; Gasparoni N; Gasparoni G; Gianmoena K; Cadenas C; Polansky JK; Ebert P; Nordström K; Barann M; Sinha A; Fröhler S; Xiong J; Dehghani Amirabad A; Behjati Ardakani F; Hutter B; Zipprich G; Felder B; Eils J; Brors B; Chen W; Hengstler JG; Hamann A; Lengauer T; Rosenstiel P; Walter J; Schulz MH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jan; 45(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 27899623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ChIP-Seq Data Analysis to Define Transcriptional Regulatory Networks.
Pavesi G
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 160():1-14. PubMed ID: 28070596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
Chung D; Kuan PF; Li B; Sanalkumar R; Liang K; Bresnick EH; Dewey C; Keleş S
PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002111. PubMed ID: 21779159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
Kumar S; Bucher P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of C2H2-ZF binding preferences from ChIP-seq data using RCADE.
Najafabadi HS; Albu M; Hughes TR
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2879-81. PubMed ID: 25953800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global analysis of transcription factor-binding sites in yeast using ChIP-Seq.
Lefrançois P; Gallagher JE; Snyder M
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1205():231-55. PubMed ID: 25213249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-Wide Identification of Transcription Factor-Binding Sites in Quiescent Adult Neural Stem Cells.
Mukherjee S; Hsieh J
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1686():265-286. PubMed ID: 29030827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of ChIP-seq in the discovery of transcription factor binding sites, differential gene regulation mechanism, epigenetic marks and beyond.
Mundade R; Ozer HG; Wei H; Prabhu L; Lu T
Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(18):2847-52. PubMed ID: 25486472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
Zhu LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
