BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22863239)

  • 1. Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.
    Munro S; Kornelsen J; Grzybowski S
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 22863239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study.
    Behruzi R; Klam S; Dehertog M; Jimenez V; Hatem M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jun; 17(1):200. PubMed ID: 28651552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.
    Vedam S; Schummers L; Stoll K; Rogers J; Klein MC; Fairbrother N; Dharamsi S; Liston R; Chong GK; Kaczorowski J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 22925396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obstetric services in small rural communities: what are the risks to care providers?
    Kornelsen JA; Grzybowski SW
    Rural Remote Health; 2008; 8(2):943. PubMed ID: 18576895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.
    Warmelink JC; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Klomp T; Hutton EK
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():45-52. PubMed ID: 28926751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the potential for evidence-based midwifery-led services in very remote Australia: viewpoints from local stakeholders.
    Quinn E; Noble J; Seale H; Ward JE
    Women Birth; 2013 Dec; 26(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 24012012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Description of a successful collaborative birth center practice among midwives and an obstetrician.
    Stevens JR; Witmer TL; Grant RL; Cammarano DJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 22963694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exercise of essential competencies for midwifery care by nurses in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Narchi NZ
    Midwifery; 2011 Feb; 27(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19892446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midwifery scope of practice among staff nurses: a grounded theory study in Gujarat, India.
    Sharma B; Johansson E; Prakasamma M; Mavalankar D; Christensson K
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 22818392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidisciplinary collaborative maternity care in Canada: easier said than done.
    Peterson WE; Medves JM; Davies BL; Graham ID
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Nov; 29(11):880-886. PubMed ID: 17977491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.
    Macdonald D; Snelgrove-Clarke E; Campbell-Yeo M; Aston M; Helwig M; Baker KA
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):74-127. PubMed ID: 26657466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women and healthcare providers' perceptions of a midwife-led unit in a Swiss university hospital: a qualitative study.
    Maillefer F; de Labrusse C; Cardia-Vonèche L; Hohlfeld P; Stoll B
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Mar; 15():56. PubMed ID: 25886389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interprofessional collaborative practice in obstetrics and midwifery.
    King TL; Laros RK; Parer JT
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 22963700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Level of acceptance of different models of maternity care.
    Brown JB; Smith C; Stewart M; Trim K; Freeman T; Beckhoff C; Kasperski MJ
    Can Nurse; 2009 Jan; 105(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19149053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The struggle for contested boundaries in the move to collaborative care teams in Australian maternity care.
    McIntyre M; Francis K; Chapman Y
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 21993203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus?
    Blais R; Maheux B; Lambert J; Loiselle J; Gauthier N; Framarin A
    CMAJ; 1994 Mar; 150(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 8313288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A successful model of collaborative practice in a university-based maternity care setting.
    Blanchard MH; Kriebs JM
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 22963696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Home birth in North America: attitudes and practice of US certified nurse-midwives and Canadian registered midwives.
    Vedam S; Stoll K; Schummers L; Rogers J; Paine LL
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 24165202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 135.