These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22863412)

  • 1. Changing auditory time with prismatic goggles.
    Magnani B; Pavani F; Frassinetti F
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 22863412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of posterior parietal cortices on prismatic adaptation effects on the representation of time intervals.
    Magnani B; Mangano GR; Frassinetti F; Oliveri M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2825-32. PubMed ID: 23954714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prismatic lenses shift time perception.
    Frassinetti F; Magnani B; Oliveri M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):949-54. PubMed ID: 19549081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual recalibration of auditory spatial perception: two separate neural circuits for perceptual learning.
    Passamonti C; Frissen I; Làdavas E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 30(6):1141-50. PubMed ID: 19735289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of spatial adaptation on auditory motion processing.
    Getzmann S; Lewald J
    Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):21-9. PubMed ID: 21108997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study.
    Rao A; Zhang Y; Miller S
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):123-32. PubMed ID: 20595021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical representation of release from auditory masking.
    Ernst SM; Uppenkamp S; Verhey JL
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):835-42. PubMed ID: 19616635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming the mental time line.
    Di Bono MG; Casarotti M; Priftis K; Gava L; Umiltà C; Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):838-42. PubMed ID: 22564162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound.
    Alain C; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):126-35. PubMed ID: 22101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.