These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22864960)

  • 1. Proximal thoracic aortic diameter measurements at CT: repeatability and reproducibility according to measurement method.
    Quint LE; Liu PS; Booher AM; Watcharotone K; Myles JD
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 22864960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measuring the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta on computed tomography.
    Chen CK; Chou HP; Guo CY; Chang HT; Chang YY; Chen IM; Wu MH; Shih CC
    J Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 68(4):1183-1192.e1. PubMed ID: 29705085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in maximum diameter measurements of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms using unformatted planes versus images corrected to aortic centerline.
    Rudarakanchana N; Bicknell CD; Cheshire NJ; Burfitt N; Chapman A; Hamady M; Powell JT
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 47(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 24183250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound- and centerline computed tomography-determined aortic diameters during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
    Han SM; Elsayed RS; Ham SW; Mahajan A; Fleischman F; Rowe VL; Cunningham MJ; Weaver FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 66(4):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28648482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the thoracic aorta using a semi-automated post processing tool.
    Entezari P; Kino A; Honarmand AR; Galizia MS; Yang Y; Collins J; Yaghmai V; Carr JC
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1558-64. PubMed ID: 23680155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximal thoracic aortic diameters: transesophageal-echocardiography- versus computed-tomography-derived measurements.
    Agarwal PP; Liu PS; Hagan P; Booher AM; Watcharotone K; Quint LE
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 26995569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability of ascending aorta diameter measurements as assessed with electrocardiography-gated multidetector computerized tomography and computer assisted diagnosis software.
    Lu TL; Rizzo E; Marques-Vidal PM; Segesser LK; Dehmeshki J; Qanadli SD
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 19884165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel software tool for semi-automatic quantification of thoracic aorta dilatation on baseline and follow-up computed tomography angiography.
    Gao X; Boccalini S; Kitslaar PH; Budde RPJ; Tu S; Lelieveldt BPF; Dijkstra J; Reiber JHC
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):711-723. PubMed ID: 30552522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MDCT interpretation of the ascending aorta with semiautomated measurement software: improved reproducibility compared with manual techniques.
    Ahmed S; Zimmerman SL; Johnson PT; Lai H; Kawamoto S; Horton KM; Fishman EK
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 24568947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and variability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR.
    Müller-Eschner M; Rengier F; Partovi S; Weber TF; Kopp-Schneider A; Geisbüsch P; Kauczor HU; von Tengg-Kobligk H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Mar; 45(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 23318135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Corriere MA; Islam A; Craven TE; Conlee TD; Hurie JB; Edwards MS
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1224-31.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24439321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR among non-experts.
    Rengier F; Weber TF; Partovi S; Müller-Eschner M; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; von Tengg-Kobligk H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 42(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 21570879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound-determined diameter measurements are more accurate than axial computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
    Han SM; Patel K; Rowe VL; Perese S; Bond A; Weaver FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jun; 51(6):1381-7; discussion 1387-9. PubMed ID: 20488320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.
    Hyhlik-Dürr A; Krieger T; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Able T; Böckler D
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 21679063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thoracic Aortic Strain is Irrelevant Regarding Endograft Sizing in Most Young Patients.
    Csobay-Novák C; Fontanini DM; Szilágyi B; Szeberin Z; Kolossváry M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Hüttl K; Sótonyi P
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Jan; 38():227-232. PubMed ID: 27522983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of error in the measurement of aortic diameter in computed tomography scans.
    Parodi J; Berguer R; Carrascosa P; Khanafer K; Capunay C; Wizauer E
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 59(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23958070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated 3D segmentation and diameter measurement of the thoracic aorta on non-contrast enhanced CT.
    Sedghi Gamechi Z; Bons LR; Giordano M; Bos D; Budde RPJ; Kofoed KF; Pedersen JH; Roos-Hesselink JW; de Bruijne M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4613-4623. PubMed ID: 30673817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the thoracic aorta by multidetector computed tomography: age- and sex-specific reference values in adults without evident cardiovascular disease.
    Lin FY; Devereux RB; Roman MJ; Meng J; Jow VM; Jacobs A; Weinsaft JW; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Gilmore A; Callister TQ; Min JK
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2008; 2(5):298-308. PubMed ID: 19083966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic changes in aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle measured by computed tomography angiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Huang J; Wang Y; Lin L; Li Z; Shan Z; Zheng S
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 May; 69(5):1538-1544. PubMed ID: 31010518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new "angle" on aortic neck angulation measurement.
    Rockley M; Hadziomerovic A; van Walraven C; Bose P; Scallan O; Jetty P
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Sep; 70(3):756-761.e1. PubMed ID: 30837183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.