These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2286540)

  • 41. Management factors associated with farrowing rate in commercial sow herds in Ontario.
    Young B; Dewey CE; Friendship RM
    Can Vet J; 2010 Feb; 51(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 20436865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England.
    Kilbride AL; Mendl M; Statham P; Held S; Harris M; Cooper S; Green LE
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 May; 104(3-4):281-91. PubMed ID: 22197175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
    Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Swine herds achieve high performance by culling low lifetime efficiency sows in early parity.
    Takanashi A; McTaggart I; Koketsu Y
    J Vet Med Sci; 2011 Nov; 73(11):1405-9. PubMed ID: 21712643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Genetic and environmental trends for litter size in swine.
    Southwood OI; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3177-82. PubMed ID: 1894552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Double and triple matings associated with reproductive performance in first-serviced and reserviced female pigs in commercial herds.
    Takai Y; Koketsu Y
    J Vet Med Sci; 2009 May; 71(5):635-9. PubMed ID: 19498291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lifetime reproductive and financial performance of female swine.
    Lucia T; Dial GD; Marsh WE
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Jun; 216(11):1802-9. PubMed ID: 10844975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.
    Putz AM; Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Knauer MT
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 93(11):5153-63. PubMed ID: 26641035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Outcome of performance-based removal and replacement decisions in commercial swine herds.
    Rutten-Ramos SC; Deen J
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Mar; 234(5):665-8. PubMed ID: 19250047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technical note: High-performing swine herds improved their reproductive performance differently from ordinary herds for five years.
    Koketsu Y
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3110-5. PubMed ID: 17609468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Within-farm variability in number of females mated per week during a one-year period and breeding herd productivity on swine farms.
    Koketsu Y; Duangkaew C; Dial GD; Reeves DE
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1999 Feb; 214(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 10029855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Gilt development and mating in commercial swine herds with varying reproductive performance.
    Kaneko M; Koketsu Y
    Theriogenology; 2012 Mar; 77(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 22030033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of an animal model for across-herd genetic evaluation of number born alive in swine.
    Woodward BW; Mabry JW; See MT; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Aug; 71(8):2040-6. PubMed ID: 8376227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows.
    Freking BA; Lents CA; Vallet JL
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Apr; 167():16-21. PubMed ID: 26869209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Associations between age of gilts at first mating and lifetime performance or culling risk in commercial herds.
    Saito H; Sasaki Y; Koketsu Y
    J Vet Med Sci; 2011 May; 73(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 21173552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Climatic effects on sow fertility and piglet survival under influence of a moderate climate.
    Wegner K; Lambertz C; Daş G; Reiner G; Gauly M
    Animal; 2014 Sep; 8(9):1526-33. PubMed ID: 24846319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of a porcine epidemic diarrhea outbreak on swine productivity in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.
    Yamane I; Yamazaki H; Ishizeki S; Watanabe Y; Okumura H; Okubo M; Kure K; Hayakawa Y; Furukawa M; Ooi M; Mizukami Y; Ito M
    J Vet Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 78(9):1385-1389. PubMed ID: 27170488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification of sow-specific risk factors for late pregnancy loss during the seasonal infertility period in pigs.
    Bertoldo M; Grupen CG; Thomson PC; Evans G; Holyoake PK
    Theriogenology; 2009 Aug; 72(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 19464731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Herd management procedures and factors associated with low farrowing rate of female pigs in Japanese commercial herds.
    Kaneko M; Iida R; Koketsu Y
    Prev Vet Med; 2013 Apr; 109(1-2):69-75. PubMed ID: 23092907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.