BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2286542)

  • 1. Practical means for estimating pork carcass composition.
    Orcutt MW; Forrest JC; Judge MD; Schinckel AP; Kuei CH
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):3987-97. PubMed ID: 2286542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of live and carcass characteristics of market hogs by use of a single longitudinal ultrasonic scan.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Riemann MJ; Wyatt RW; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1409-16. PubMed ID: 8071163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using ultrasound technology to predict pork carcass composition.
    Terry CA; Savell JW; Recio HA; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1989 May; 67(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 2661515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
    Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pork carcass evaluation with an automated and computerized ultrasonic system.
    Liu Y; Stouffer JR
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jan; 73(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 7601745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prediction of percentage of fat in pork carcasses.
    Johnson LP; Miller MF; Haydon KD; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4185-92. PubMed ID: 2286560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growth, development, and carcass composition in five genotypes of swine.
    Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1719-29. PubMed ID: 1634396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotype and treatment biases in estimation of carcass lean of swine.
    Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Watkins LE
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1708-18. PubMed ID: 1634395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of swine carcass composition by total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC).
    Higbie AD; Bidner TD; Matthews JO; Southern LL; Page TG; Persica MA; Sanders MB; Monlezun CJ
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jan; 80(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 11831507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of carcass characteristics by real-time ultrasound in barrows and gilts slaughtered at three weights.
    Smith BS; Jones WR; Hough JD; Huffman DL; Mikel WB; Mulvaney DR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2304-8. PubMed ID: 1506294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
    McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
    Akridge JT; Brorsen BW; Whipker LD; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 1582906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pork carcass composition: II. Use of indicator cuts for predicting carcass composition.
    Swensen K; Ellis M; Brewer MS; Novakofski J; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2405-14. PubMed ID: 9781497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioelectrical impedance: a nondestructive method to determine fat-free mass of live market swine and pork carcasses.
    Swantek PM; Crenshaw JD; Marchello MJ; Lukaski HC
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 1582904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of carcass composition, ham and foreleg weights, and lean meat yields of Iberian pigs using ultrasound measurements in live animals.
    Ayuso D; González A; Hernández F; Corral JM; Izquierdo M
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1884-92. PubMed ID: 23408817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.