151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22865510)
1. Changing trends in a decade of vascular radiology-the impact of technical developments of non-invasive techniques on vascular imaging.
Cowell GW; Reid AW; Roditi GH
Insights Imaging; 2012 Oct; 3(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 22865510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
Collins R; Cranny G; Burch J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Craig D; Wright K; Berry E; Gough M; Kleijnen J; Westwood M
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 17462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for visualization and quantification of endovascular aortic prosthesis, their endoleaks and aneurysm sacs at 1.5 T.
Salehi Ravesh M; Langguth P; Pfarr JA; Schupp J; Trentmann J; Koktzoglou I; Edelman RR; Graessner J; Greiser A; Hautemann D; Hennemuth A; Both M; Jansen O; Hövener JB; Schäfer JP
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 31075419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1993-7. PubMed ID: 19749216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance coronary angiography: are you ready?
Gaylord GM
Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 12229053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The increased use of computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography as the sole imaging modalities prior to infrainguinal bypass has had no effect on outcomes.
Shue B; Damle RN; Flahive J; Kalish JA; Stone DH; Patel VI; Schanzer A; Baril DT
Ann Vasc Surg; 2015 Aug; 29(6):1245-54. PubMed ID: 26032010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of 3D-CTA and 4D-CE-MRA for the dynamic monitoring of angiogenesis in a rabbit VX2 tumor.
Wang H; Zheng LF; Feng Y; Xie XQ; Zhao JL; Wang XF; Zhang GX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 20413238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography provides comparable vascular conspicuity to CT angiography in dogs with intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.
Wilson S; Culp WTN; Wisner ER; Cissell DD; Finn JP; Zwingenberger AL
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2021 Jul; 62(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 33634935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low dose CE-MRA.
Nael K; Moriarty JM; Finn JP
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 21458187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost impact of diagnostic imaging for lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease.
Hay JW; Lawler E; Yucel K; Guo A; Balzer T; Gaziano JM; Scranton RE
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18657093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Repeat Cerebrovascular Imaging among Hospitalized Stroke Patients.
Raza SA; Javalkar V; Dehkharghani S; Kudrimoti A; Saindane A; Mullins M; Nahab F
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Jul; 26(7):1588-1593. PubMed ID: 28268151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fusion guidance in endovascular peripheral artery interventions: a feasibility study.
Sailer AM; de Haan MW; de Graaf R; van Zwam WH; Schurink GW; Nelemans PJ; Wildberger JE; Das M
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Apr; 38(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 25073947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of combined acquisition of low-dose time-resolved and single-phase high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in a single session for pre-angiographic evaluation of spinal vascular disease.
Shin JH; Choi Y; Park B; Shin NY; Jang J; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn K; Kim BS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214289. PubMed ID: 30921365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [3D-CTA and 4D-CE-MRA for dynamic monitoring tumor angiogenesis in a rabbit VX2 tumor].
Wang H; Zhang GX; Feng Y; Zhang F; Wang XF; Shen C
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 May; 90(19):1337-41. PubMed ID: 20646584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Khan S; Cloud GC; Kerry S; Markus HS
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2007 Nov; 78(11):1218-25. PubMed ID: 17287234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary results on the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography.
Harrison MJ; Johnson BA; Gardner GM; Welling BG
Neurosurgery; 1997 May; 40(5):947-55; discussion 955-7. PubMed ID: 9149253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
