These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22866047)

  • 1. How positive affect modulates proactive control: reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal.
    Fröber K; Dreisbach G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():265. PubMed ID: 22866047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Altered proactive control in adults with ADHD: Evidence from event-related potentials during cued task switching.
    Sidlauskaite J; Dhar M; Sonuga-Barke E; Wiersema JR
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107330. PubMed ID: 31887312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward favors the prepared: Incentive and task-informative cues interact to enhance attentional control.
    Chiew KS; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 26322689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Arousal and Approach Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control. An ERP Study.
    Cudo A; Francuz P; Augustynowicz P; Stróżak P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():320. PubMed ID: 30233339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 22506894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context.
    Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive and reactive metacontrol in task switching.
    Kang MS; Chiu YC
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1617-1632. PubMed ID: 34136973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired proactive control in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: Evidence from ERPs.
    Su B; Zheng M
    J Psychiatr Res; 2023 Apr; 160():47-55. PubMed ID: 36774830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactive Inhibition Activation Depends on Motor Preparation: A Single Pulse TMS Study.
    Ficarella SC; Battelli L
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1891. PubMed ID: 30364148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Processes of Proactive and Reactive Controls Modulated by Motor-Skill Experiences.
    Yu Q; Chau BKH; Lam BYH; Wong AWK; Peng J; Chan CCH
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():404. PubMed ID: 31798435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.
    Karayanidis F; Mansfield EL; Galloway KL; Smith JL; Provost A; Heathcote A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 9(2):202-15. PubMed ID: 19403896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Reisenauer R; Jacobsen T; Dreisbach G
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():287. PubMed ID: 22908004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain oscillatory activity associated with switch and mixing costs during reactive control.
    Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Arbula S; Vallesi A
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13642. PubMed ID: 32720385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.