These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22866047)

  • 21. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast Neural Dynamics of Proactive Cognitive Control in a Task-Switching Analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.
    Gema Díaz-Blancat ; Juan García-Prieto ; Fernando Maestú ; Francisco Barceló
    Brain Topogr; 2018 May; 31(3):407-418. PubMed ID: 29124546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cue-induced activation of implicit affective associations with heroin use in abstinent heroin abusers.
    Chen J; Wang X; Zhang M; Zhang F; Shen M
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Jun; 47():120-8. PubMed ID: 25574597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Proactive control of affective distraction: Experience-based but not expectancy-based.
    Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kleinsorge T; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104072. PubMed ID: 31520864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Switch hands! Mapping temporal dynamics of proactive manual control with anticues.
    Adam JJ; Jennings S; Bovend'Eerdt TJ; Hurks PP; Van Gerven PW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():137-44. PubMed ID: 26386782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motivational intensity modulates the effects of positive emotions on set shifting after controlling physiological arousal.
    Zhou Y; Siu AF
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Dec; 56(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 26453484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Emotional processes in schizophrenia: investigation of the evaluative component].
    Sander D; Koenig O; Georgieff N; Terra JL; Franck N
    Encephale; 2005; 31(6 Pt 1):672-82. PubMed ID: 16462686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects.
    Ansorge U; Gozli DG; Goller F
    Psychol Res; 2019 Sep; 83(6):1251-1268. PubMed ID: 29188426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The affective twitches of task switches: Task switch cues are evaluated as negative.
    Vermeylen L; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():124-130. PubMed ID: 30447518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Koster EH; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Emotion; 2008 Dec; 8(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 19102600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.
    Janowich JR; Cavanagh JF
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):910-926. PubMed ID: 30607833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of foreknowledge and task-set shifting as mirrored in cue- and target-locked event-related potentials.
    Finke M; Escera C; Barceló F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49486. PubMed ID: 23152912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lost in Time and Space: States of High Arousal Disrupt Implicit Acquisition of Spatial and Sequential Context Information.
    Maran T; Sachse P; Martini M; Weber B; Pinggera J; Zuggal S; Furtner M
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2017; 11():206. PubMed ID: 29170634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Switch hands! Mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span.
    Van Gerven PW; Hurks PP; Bovend'Eerdt TJ; Adam JJ
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jun; 52(6):960-71. PubMed ID: 27124653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.