315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22866414)
21. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.
Sommers TM; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall DA
J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11935928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shall I go digital?
Thomas BL; Davies J; Whaites E
Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):314-6, 319-22, 325-6. PubMed ID: 24930253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.
Vandenberghe B; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 20461423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computed vs. film-based radiographs' contour artifacts influence diagnosis of secondary caries.
Danz JC; Flück HP; Campus G; Wolf TG
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():111004. PubMed ID: 37556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical techniques to reduce sensor plate damage in PSP digital radiography.
Roberts MW; Mol A
J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):169-70. PubMed ID: 15587103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phosphor plate radiography: an integral component of the filmless practice.
Benjamin S
Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):89. PubMed ID: 21133024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
