These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22866763)

  • 1. Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance.
    Halvorson KM; Ebner H; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):413-32. PubMed ID: 22866763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible.
    Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 14585010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003).
    Greenwald AG; Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):632-6. PubMed ID: 15161391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005).
    Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):221-5. PubMed ID: 15709875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?
    Halvorson KM; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1403-9. PubMed ID: 25754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive pitfall! Videogame players are not immune to dual-task costs.
    Donohue SE; James B; Eslick AN; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 22669792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of dual-task performance after minimizing task-preparation.
    Erickson KI; Colcombe SJ; Wadhwa R; Bherer L; Peterson MS; Scalf PE; Kramer AF
    Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):967-79. PubMed ID: 16109493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005).
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 15709876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
    Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.
    Israel M; Cohen A
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):513-24. PubMed ID: 21735041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):795-810. PubMed ID: 15462621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.