These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22867756)

  • 1. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations.
    Ladics GS; Cressman RF; Herouet-Guicheney C; Herman RA; Privalle L; Song P; Ward JM; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 60(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21320564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting the biological relevance of bioinformatic analyses with T-DNA sequence for protein allergenicity.
    Harper B; McClain S; Ganko EW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 22668749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allermatch, a webtool for the prediction of potential allergenicity according to current FAO/WHO Codex alimentarius guidelines.
    Fiers MW; Kleter GA; Nijland H; Peijnenburg AA; Nap JP; van Ham RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():133. PubMed ID: 15373946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioinformatic analysis for allergenicity assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins expressed in insect-resistant food crops.
    Randhawa GJ; Singh M; Grover M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 49(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 21078358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of global sequence comparison and one-to-one FASTA local alignment in regulatory allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins in food crops.
    Song P; Herman RA; Kumpatla S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 71():142-8. PubMed ID: 24953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Bar, Barnase, and Barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches.
    Siruguri V; Bharatraj DK; Vankudavath RN; Mendu VV; Gupta V; Goodman RE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Sep; 83():93-102. PubMed ID: 26079618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.
    Silvanovich A; Nemeth MA; Song P; Herman R; Tagliani L; Bannon GA
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Mar; 90(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 16338955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
    Goodman RE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S24-34. PubMed ID: 18715545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops.
    Ladics GS
    J Immunotoxicol; 2019 Dec; 16(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 30409058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.