BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1073 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22867804)

  • 1. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Sghaireen MG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals crowns with different design: an in vitro study.
    Larsson C; El Madhoun S; Wennerberg A; Vult von Steyern P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):820-6. PubMed ID: 21635559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of metal ceramic restorations with two different margin designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
    Michalakis KX; Stratos A; Hirayama H; Kang K; Touloumi F; Oishi Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19703624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue resistance of 2 different CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials used for single-tooth implant crowns.
    Çavuşoğlu Y; Sahin E; Gürbüz R; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 21881517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fracture strength and thermal shock resistance of metal-ceramic crowns with cast and machined AuTi frameworks.
    Kellerhoff RK; Fischer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 17499090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.