These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22867807)

  • 1. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Acar O; Erkut S; Lakshmipathy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 22867807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recording surface detail on moist surfaces with elastomeric impression materials.
    McCabe JF; Carrick TE
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Mar; 14(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16599098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials.
    Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 17625631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.