These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22868073)

  • 1. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Huang NF; Dowsey MM; Ee E; Stoney JD; Babazadeh S; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Oct; 27(9):1737-41. PubMed ID: 22868073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
    Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
    Choong PF; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18534397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
    Seon JK; Song EK
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
    Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
    Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.
    Cobb J; Henckel J; Gomes P; Harris S; Jakopec M; Rodriguez F; Barrett A; Davies B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16434522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted and manual techniques.
    Novicoff WM; Saleh KJ; Mihalko WM; Wang XQ; Knaebel HP
    Instr Course Lect; 2010; 59():109-17. PubMed ID: 20415374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim TK; Chang CB; Kang YG; Chung BJ; Cho HJ; Seong SC
    Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19581096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Khan MM; Khan MW; Al-Harbi HH; Weening BS; Zalzal PK
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21704485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved clinical outcomes after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a 5-year follow-up study.
    Seng C; Yeo SJ; Wee JL; Subanesh S; Chong HC; Lo NN
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1025-30. PubMed ID: 21074355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
    Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Biasca N; Schneider TO; Bungartz M
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):537-63, x. PubMed ID: 19773060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
    Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
    Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases.
    Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 21675934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.
    Spencer JM; Chauhan SK; Sloan K; Taylor A; Beaver RJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17463115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
    J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
    Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.