These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22868568)

  • 1. Optimizing multiscale SSIM for compression via MLDS.
    Charrier C; Knoblauch K; Maloney LT; Bovik AC; Moorthy AK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Dec; 21(12):4682-94. PubMed ID: 22868568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective Assessment of Objective Image Quality Metrics Range Guaranteeing Visually Lossless Compression.
    Afnan ; Ullah F; Yaseen ; Lee J; Jamil S; Kwon OJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum likelihood difference scaling of image quality in compression-degraded images.
    Charrier C; Maloney LT; Cherifi H; Knoblauch K
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Nov; 24(11):3418-26. PubMed ID: 17975567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images.
    Ohashi K; Nagatani Y; Yoshigoe M; Iwai K; Tsuchiya K; Hino A; Kida Y; Yamazaki A; Ishida T
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Dec; 36(6):2623-2634. PubMed ID: 37550519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
    Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 15766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Objective Image Quality Metrics to Expert Radiologists' Scoring of Diagnostic Quality of MR Images.
    Mason A; Rioux J; Clarke SE; Costa A; Schmidt M; Keough V; Huynh T; Beyea S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Apr; 39(4):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 31535985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural similarity quality metrics in a coding context: exploring the space of realistic distortions.
    Brooks AC; Zhao X; Pappas TN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1261-73. PubMed ID: 18632337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
    Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A perceptually relevant MSE-based image quality metric.
    Tan HL; Li Z; Tan YH; Rahardja S; Yeo C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Nov; 22(11):4447-59. PubMed ID: 24057005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using a visual discrimination model for the detection of compression artifacts in virtual pathology images.
    Johnson JP; Krupinski EA; Yan M; Roehrig H; Graham AR; Weinstein RS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 20875970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI motion artifact reduction using a conditional diffusion probabilistic model (MAR-CDPM).
    Safari M; Yang X; Fatemi A; Archambault L
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2598-2610. PubMed ID: 38009583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the proper use of structural similarity for the robust evaluation of medical image synthesis models.
    Gourdeau D; Duchesne S; Archambault L
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2462-2474. PubMed ID: 35106778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep Learning Denoising of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Chest Images: A Quantitative and Qualitative Image Analysis.
    Azour L; Hu Y; Ko JP; Chen B; Knoll F; Alpert JB; Brusca-Augello G; Mason DM; Wickstrom ML; Kwon YJF; Babb J; Liang Z; Moore WH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 36790870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels.
    Joemai RMS; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 90(1079):20160519. PubMed ID: 28830200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. STEDNet: Swin transformer-based encoder-decoder network for noise reduction in low-dose CT.
    Zhu L; Han Y; Xi X; Fu H; Tan S; Liu M; Yang S; Liu C; Li L; Yan B
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4443-4458. PubMed ID: 36708286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive-weighted high order TV algorithm for sparse-view CT reconstruction.
    Xi Y; Zhou P; Yu H; Zhang T; Zhang L; Qiao Z; Liu F
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5568-5584. PubMed ID: 36934310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of linear equalizers optimized for the structural similarity index.
    Channappayya SS; Bovik AC; Caramanis C; Heath RW
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Jun; 17(6):857-72. PubMed ID: 18482882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images.
    Oh J; Woolley SI; Arvanitis TN; Townend JN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1352-61. PubMed ID: 11811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase-regularized and displacement-regularized compressed sensing for fast magnetic resonance elastography.
    Mohammed S; Kozlowski P; Salcudean S
    NMR Biomed; 2023 Jul; 36(7):e4899. PubMed ID: 36628624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.