These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22868677)

  • 21. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences.
    Liu L; Yu L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):468-77. PubMed ID: 20525601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models.
    Chauve C; Ponty Y; Wallner M
    J Math Biol; 2020 Apr; 80(5):1353-1388. PubMed ID: 32060618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consistency properties of species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences.
    Than CV; Rosenberg NA
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21210728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the Number of Non-equivalent Ancestral Configurations for Matching Gene Trees and Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):384-407. PubMed ID: 28913585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.
    Liu L; Yu L; Kubatko L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):320-8. PubMed ID: 19501178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. STELLS2: fast and accurate coalescent-based maximum likelihood inference of species trees from gene tree topologies.
    Pei J; Wu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 33(12):1789-1797. PubMed ID: 28186220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coalescent histories for caterpillar-like families.
    Rosenberg NA
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(5):1253-62. PubMed ID: 24524157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An algorithm for computing the gene tree probability under the multispecies coalescent and its application in the inference of population tree.
    Wu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(12):i225-i233. PubMed ID: 27307621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees.
    Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar; 61(2):225-47. PubMed ID: 11969392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coalescent-based species tree inference from gene tree topologies under incomplete lineage sorting by maximum likelihood.
    Wu Y
    Evolution; 2012 Mar; 66(3):763-775. PubMed ID: 22380439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effect of Gene Flow on Coalescent-based Species-Tree Inference.
    Long C; Kubatko L
    Syst Biol; 2018 Sep; 67(5):770-785. PubMed ID: 29566212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process.
    Degnan JH; Salter LA
    Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 15792224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Species Tree Inference from Gene Splits by Unrooted STAR Methods.
    Allman ES; Degnan JH; Rhodes JA
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(1):337-342. PubMed ID: 28113601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enumeration of Ancestral Configurations for Matching Gene Trees and Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):831-850. PubMed ID: 28437136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analytical upper bound on the number of loci required for all splits of a species tree to appear in a set of gene trees.
    Uricchio LH; Warnow T; Rosenberg NA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(Suppl 14):417. PubMed ID: 28185570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Displayed Trees Do Not Determine Distinguishability Under the Network Multispecies Coalescent.
    Zhu S; Degnan JH
    Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 66(2):283-298. PubMed ID: 27780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Asymptotic Properties of the Number of Matching Coalescent Histories for Caterpillar-Like Families of Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(5):913-925. PubMed ID: 26452289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probabilistic Species Tree Distances: Implementing the Multispecies Coalescent to Compare Species Trees Within the Same Model-Based Framework Used to Estimate Them.
    Adams RH; Castoe TA
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31086978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods.
    Leaché AD; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 21088009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.