These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22869057)

  • 1. Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.
    Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; McDonnell M; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):E1438-43. PubMed ID: 22869057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical total disc replacement exhibits similar stiffness to intact cervical functional spinal units tested on a dynamic pendulum testing system.
    Esmende SM; Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 25194516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) utilizing a pendulum testing system.
    Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57412. PubMed ID: 23451222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic flexion/extension properties of the lumbar spine in vitro using a novel pendulum system.
    Crisco JJ; Fujita L; Spenciner DB
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2767-73. PubMed ID: 17367798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.
    McNally D; Naylor J; Johnson S
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S612-7. PubMed ID: 22411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix characteristics of the intact intervertebral disc and a disc replacement.
    Holsgrove TP; Gill HS; Miles AW; Gheduzzi S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Nov; 229(11):769-77. PubMed ID: 26503838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.
    Knapik GG; Mendel E; Marras WS
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S641-52. PubMed ID: 21445618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
    Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation.
    Pimenta L; Turner A; Oliveira L; Marchi L; Cornwall B
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 76(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 25545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Needle puncture in rabbit functional spinal units alters rotational biomechanics.
    Hartman RA; Bell KM; Quan B; Nuzhao Y; Sowa GA; Kang JD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E146-53. PubMed ID: 25370985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
    Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.
    Käfer W; Cakir B; Midderhoff S; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2330-9. PubMed ID: 24722881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.