196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22869057)
1. Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.
Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; McDonnell M; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):E1438-43. PubMed ID: 22869057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical total disc replacement exhibits similar stiffness to intact cervical functional spinal units tested on a dynamic pendulum testing system.
Esmende SM; Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 25194516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) utilizing a pendulum testing system.
Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Koruprolu S; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57412. PubMed ID: 23451222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic flexion/extension properties of the lumbar spine in vitro using a novel pendulum system.
Crisco JJ; Fujita L; Spenciner DB
J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2767-73. PubMed ID: 17367798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.
McNally D; Naylor J; Johnson S
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S612-7. PubMed ID: 22411042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.
Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix characteristics of the intact intervertebral disc and a disc replacement.
Holsgrove TP; Gill HS; Miles AW; Gheduzzi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Nov; 229(11):769-77. PubMed ID: 26503838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.
Knapik GG; Mendel E; Marras WS
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S641-52. PubMed ID: 21445618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation.
Pimenta L; Turner A; Oliveira L; Marchi L; Cornwall B
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 76(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 25545808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Needle puncture in rabbit functional spinal units alters rotational biomechanics.
Hartman RA; Bell KM; Quan B; Nuzhao Y; Sowa GA; Kang JD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E146-53. PubMed ID: 25370985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.
Käfer W; Cakir B; Midderhoff S; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2330-9. PubMed ID: 24722881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]