These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22869057)

  • 21. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
    Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of posterior decompressive procedures on segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Brody MJ; Patel AA; Ghanayem AJ; Wojewnik B; Carandang G; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Vastardis G; Potluri T; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1558-63. PubMed ID: 24979138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement].
    Weisskopf M; Ohnsorge JA; Martini F; Niethard FU; Birnbaum K
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 18704840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
    Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
    Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Auerbach JD; Wills BP; McIntosh TC; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 17334286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement.
    Kraft M; Koch DK; Bushelow M
    Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):603-11. PubMed ID: 22964013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sagittal rotational stiffness and damping increase in a porcine lumbar spine with increased or prolonged loading.
    Zondervan RL; Popovich JM; Radcliffe CJ; Pathak PK; Reeves NP
    J Biomech; 2016 Feb; 49(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 26892899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the torsional stiffness of the lumbar spine in flexion and extension.
    Garges KJ; Nourbakhsh A; Morris R; Yang J; Mody M; Patterson R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):563-9. PubMed ID: 18984238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Crystallinity dependency of the time-dependent mechanical response of polyethylene: application in total disc replacement.
    Jiang Q; Zaïri F; Fréderix C; Derrouiche A; Yan Z; Qu Z; Liu X; Zaïri F
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Apr; 30(4):46. PubMed ID: 30953223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
    Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disc nucleus fortification for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a biomechanical study.
    Dupré DA; Cook DJ; Brad Bellotte J; Oh MY; Whiting D; Cheng BC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 26771371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
    Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of a novel, minimally invasive, extension-limiting device for the lumbar spine.
    Palmer S; Mahar A; Oka R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Jan; 22(1):E4. PubMed ID: 17608338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.