These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22869383)

  • 1. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
    Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.
    Landers J; Goggin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 37(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 19702705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
    Rose LT; Moshegov CN
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].
    Yang Q; Chen B; Peng G; Li Z; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 50(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 24709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
    Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.
    Kiss B; Findl O; Menapace R; Wirtitsch M; Petternel V; Drexler W; Rainer G; Georgopoulos M; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 11821201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.
    Eleftheriadis H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 87(8):960-3. PubMed ID: 12881334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas.
    Geggel HS
    Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):897-902. PubMed ID: 25601534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Partial coherent interferometry--an alternative method for intraocular lens power calculation performed by ultrasonography].
    Wylegała E; Ludyga A
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 15515318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis.
    Packer M; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Coffman PG; Brown LK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 11821203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery.
    Charalampidou S; Dooley I; Molloy L; Beatty S
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 20447121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of IOL power calculation methods and intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes after refractive surgery.
    Canto AP; Chhadva P; Cabot F; Galor A; Yoo SH; Vaddavalli PK; Culbertson WW
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):484-9. PubMed ID: 23820231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative measurements for cataract surgery: a comparison of ultrasound and optical biometric devices.
    Pereira A; Popovic M; Lloyd JC; El-Defrawy S; Schlenker MB
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 41(4):1521-1530. PubMed ID: 33511513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictability of Biometry in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.
    Sorkin N; Rosenblatt A; Barequet IS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Dec; 93(12):1545-1551. PubMed ID: 27741085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].
    Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.
    Findl O; Kriechbaum K; Sacu S; Kiss B; Polak K; Nepp J; Schild G; Rainer G; Maca S; Petternel V; Lackner B; Drexler W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1950-5. PubMed ID: 14604716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.