438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22870908)
1. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22870908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Rader M; Henry D; Danese M; Halperin M; Cong Z; Qian Y; Dansey R; Chung K
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 22409231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1334-49. PubMed ID: 22578308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.
Xie J; Diener M; Sorg R; Wu EQ; Namjoshi M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 22694824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
Xie J; Namjoshi M; Wu EQ; Parikh K; Diener M; Yu AP; Guo A; Culver KW
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011 Oct; 17(8):621-43. PubMed ID: 21942303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.
Cristino J; Finek J; Jandova P; Kolek M; Pásztor B; Giannopoulou C; Qian Y; Brezina T; Lothgren M
J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):799-812. PubMed ID: 28485692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America.
Raje N; Roodman GD; Willenbacher W; Shimizu K; García-Sanz R; Terpos E; Kennedy L; Sabatelli L; Intorcia M; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):525-536. PubMed ID: 29480139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health-economic review of zoledronic acid for the management of skeletal-related events in bone-metastatic prostate cancer.
Carter JA; Botteman MF
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Aug; 12(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 22540167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients in France, Germany, Portugal, and the Netherlands.
Carter JA; Joshi A; Kaura S; Botteman MF
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 21469915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. TRAPEZE: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy with zoledronic acid, strontium-89, or both, in men with bony metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer.
James N; Pirrie S; Pope A; Barton D; Andronis L; Goranitis I; Collins S; McLaren D; O'Sullivan J; Parker C; Porfiri E; Staffurth J; Stanley A; Wylie J; Beesley S; Birtle A; Brown J; Chakraborti P; Russell M; Billingham L
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jul; 20(53):1-288. PubMed ID: 27434595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with prostate cancer.
Reed SD; Radeva JI; Glendenning GA; Saad F; Schulman KA
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1537-42. PubMed ID: 15017215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid plus endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer.
Delea TE; Taneja C; Sofrygin O; Kaura S; Gnant M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2010 Aug; 10(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 20705558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Brufsky A; Kennedy L; Bhatta S; Bhowmik D; Buchanan J; Despiegel N; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 31364885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid.
Martin M; Bell R; Bourgeois H; Brufsky A; Diel I; Eniu A; Fallowfield L; Fujiwara Y; Jassem J; Paterson AH; Ritchie D; Steger GG; Stopeck A; Vogel C; Fan M; Jiang Q; Chung K; Dansey R; Braun A
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Sep; 18(17):4841-9. PubMed ID: 22893628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.
McKeage K; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 18282018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Denosumab: a cost-effective alternative for older men with osteoporosis from a Swedish payer perspective.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Agodoa I; Silverman S; Orwoll E
Bone; 2014 Feb; 59():105-13. PubMed ID: 24231131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.
Henry DH; Costa L; Goldwasser F; Hirsh V; Hungria V; Prausova J; Scagliotti GV; Sleeboom H; Spencer A; Vadhan-Raj S; von Moos R; Willenbacher W; Woll PJ; Wang J; Jiang Q; Jun S; Dansey R; Yeh H
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Mar; 29(9):1125-32. PubMed ID: 21343556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada.
Chau D; Becker DL; Coombes ME; Ioannidis G; Adachi JD; Goeree R
J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():3-14. PubMed ID: 23035625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.
Ford J; Cummins E; Sharma P; Elders A; Stewart F; Johnston R; Royle P; Jones R; Mulatero C; Todd R; Mowatt G
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jul; 17(29):1-386. PubMed ID: 23870108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
