These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22872221)
1. Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review. Wang JC; Arnold PM; Hermsmeyer JT; Norvell DC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S133-43. PubMed ID: 22872221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review. Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Lawrence BD; Wang J; Arnold PM; Hermsmeyer J; Norvell DC; Brodke DS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S123-32. PubMed ID: 22885827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study. Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of distal adjacent segment pathology after long thoracolumbar fusion: a systematic review. Kasliwal MK; Shaffrey CI; Lenke LG; Dettori JR; Ely CG; Smith JS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S165-79. PubMed ID: 22885833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. Jacobs W; Van der Gaag NA; Tuschel A; de Kleuver M; Peul W; Verbout AJ; Oner FC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008326. PubMed ID: 22972118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion. Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis]. Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjacent segment degeneration or disease after cervical total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Qian Y; Liu H J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30285807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies. Luo J; Gong M; Huang S; Yu T; Zou X Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 25424753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Verma K; Gandhi SD; Maltenfort M; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Radcliff KE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2253-7. PubMed ID: 24335631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement. Lu S; Sun S; Kong C; Sun W; Hu H; Wang Q; Hai Y Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28870839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current incidence of adjacent segment pathology following lumbar fusion versus motion-preserving procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent projections. Donnally CJ; Patel PD; Canseco JA; Divi SN; Goz V; Sherman MB; Shenoy K; Markowitz M; Rihn JA; Vaccaro AR Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 32445805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation. Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression. Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty: A literature review and update. Chang KE; Pham MH; Hsieh PC J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37():20-24. PubMed ID: 27865820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: Incidence and risk factors. Zhong ZM; Deviren V; Tay B; Burch S; Berven SH Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 May; 156():29-34. PubMed ID: 28288396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review. Malakoutian M; Volkheimer D; Street J; Dvorak MF; Wilke HJ; Oxland TR Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1865-81. PubMed ID: 26055273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rao MJ; Cao SS Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Feb; 134(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 24323061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]