425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22872224)
1. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an adjacent segment pathology.
Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Skelly AC; Riew KD; Chapman JR; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S10-7. PubMed ID: 22872224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.
Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fehlings MG; Fourney DR; Chapman JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S10-8. PubMed ID: 21952182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review.
Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for the systematic reviews on patient safety during spine surgery.
Dettori JR; Norvell DC; Dekutoski M; Fisher C; Chapman JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9 Suppl):S22-7. PubMed ID: 20407348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review.
Wang JC; Arnold PM; Hermsmeyer JT; Norvell DC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S133-43. PubMed ID: 22872221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The natural history of degeneration of the lumbar and cervical spines: a systematic review.
Lee MJ; Dettori JR; Standaert CJ; Brodt ED; Chapman JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S18-30. PubMed ID: 22872220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of distal adjacent segment pathology after long thoracolumbar fusion: a systematic review.
Kasliwal MK; Shaffrey CI; Lenke LG; Dettori JR; Ely CG; Smith JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S165-79. PubMed ID: 22885833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
Afshari A
Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion: a systematic review.
Lawrence BD; Wang J; Arnold PM; Hermsmeyer J; Norvell DC; Brodke DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S123-32. PubMed ID: 22885827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The treatment of lumbar adjacent segment pathology after a previous lumbar surgery: a systematic review.
Chou D; Dekutoski M; Hermsmeyer J; Norvell DC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S180-8. PubMed ID: 22885830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review.
Lawrence BD; Hilibrand AS; Brodt ED; Dettori JR; Brodke DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S52-64. PubMed ID: 22885828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indication for spinal fusion and the risk of adjacent segment pathology: does reason for fusion affect risk? A systematic review.
Lee MJ; Dettori JR; Standaert CJ; Ely CG; Chapman JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S40-51. PubMed ID: 22872219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does postsurgical cervical deformity affect the risk of cervical adjacent segment pathology? A systematic review.
Hansen MA; Kim HJ; Van Alstyne EM; Skelly AC; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S75-84. PubMed ID: 22885832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
