These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22873023)

  • 1. Nasolabial angle: a perception of treatment needs.
    Sukhia RH; Sukhia HR; Fida M; Khan M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 22873023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip.
    Nandini S; Prashanth CS; Somiah SK; Reddy SR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 22186808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of orthodontic treatment need by professionals and parents with different socio-demographic characteristics.
    Doğan AA; Sari E; Uskun E; Sağlam AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 20299423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
    Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip.
    Fitzgerald JP; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 1456217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects.
    Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cephalometric evaluation of the nasolabial angle].
    Magni F; Di Blasio A
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2402256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ranking dental aesthetics and thresholds of treatment need: a comparison between patients, parents, and dentists.
    Hamdan AM; Al-Omari IK; Al-Bitar ZB
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 17702796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontic concern of parents compared with orthodontic treatment need assessed by Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Onyeaso CO
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2003 Mar; 26(101):13-20. PubMed ID: 12868139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practitioner and patient perceptions of orthodontic treatment: is the patient always right?
    McKeta N; Rinchuse DJ; Close JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Feb; 24(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 22296694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index.
    Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hard- and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
    McNamara L; McNamara JA; Ackerman MB; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 18405812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists.
    Kuroda S; Fuji A; Sugie M; Uoi S; Kondo R; Ando R; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 20197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of nasolabial angles and their relevance to tooth position in the edentulous patient.
    Brunton PA; McCord JF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 7920393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two orthodontic aesthetic indices.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Eslamipour F; Asgari I
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 22866591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of the nasolabial angle in the diagnosis and treatment of malocclusions.
    Elias AC
    Int J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 18(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 6930368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.