These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22873710)

  • 1. Negative consequences of using α = 0.05 for environmental monitoring decisions: a case study from a decade of Canada's Environmental Effects Monitoring Program.
    Mudge JF; Barrett TJ; Munkittrick KR; Houlahan JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9249-55. PubMed ID: 22873710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing α for better statistical decisions: a case study involving the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis: optimal α levels set to minimize Type I and II errors frequently result in different conclusions from those using α = 0.05.
    Mudge JF; Penny FM; Houlahan JE
    Bioessays; 2012 Dec; 34(12):1045-9. PubMed ID: 23080550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting an optimal α that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance tests.
    Mudge JF; Baker LF; Edge CB; Houlahan JE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32734. PubMed ID: 22389720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Policy characterization of ecosystem management.
    Lamont A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):5-18. PubMed ID: 16502036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of environmental information without control of subsequent decisions.
    von Winterfeldt D; Kavet R; Peck S; Mohan M; Hazen G
    Risk Anal; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2113-32. PubMed ID: 22616556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linking ecological science to decision-making: delivering environmental monitoring information as societal feedback.
    Vaughan H; Whitelaw G; Craig B; Stewart C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 88(1-3):399-408. PubMed ID: 14570425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes and not on insulin: impact of modelling assumptions on recent Canadian findings.
    Tunis SL
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Nov; 9(6):351-65. PubMed ID: 21892840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A decade of research on the environmental impacts of pulp and paper mill effluents in Canada: field studies and mechanistic research.
    McMaster ME; Hewitt LM; Parrott JL
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2006; 9(4):319-39. PubMed ID: 16723330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Canada's environmental effects monitoring program: areas for improvement.
    Huebert DB; McKernan M; Paquette C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jan; 7(1):143-4. PubMed ID: 21184575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying eradication success: the removal of feral pigs from Santa Cruz Island, California.
    Ramsey DS; Parkes J; Morrison SA
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 19040652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models.
    Tallis HM; Kareiva P
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Oct; 21(10):562-8. PubMed ID: 16876906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using biological data from field studies with multiple reference sites as a basis for environmental management: the risks for false positives and false negatives.
    Hanson N
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 21035245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community-based environmental management in Atlantic Canada: the impacts and spheres of influence of the Atlantic Coastal Action Program.
    McNeil TC; Rousseau FR; Hildebrand LP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):367-83. PubMed ID: 16520873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aquatic environmental effects monitoring guidance for environmental assessment practitioners.
    Kilgour BW; Dubé MG; Hedley K; Portt CB; Munkittrick KR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Jul; 130(1-3):423-36. PubMed ID: 17072546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operating characteristics of sample size re-estimation with futility stopping based on conditional power.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3348-65. PubMed ID: 16345019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental economic, political and ethical integration in a common decision-making framework.
    Martínez de Anguita P; Alonso E; Martín MA
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 17391838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.