140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22874226)
1. Clinical guideline representation in a CDS: a human information processing method.
Kilsdonk E; Riezebos R; Kremer L; Peute L; Jaspers M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():427-31. PubMed ID: 22874226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncovering healthcare practitioners' information processing using the think-aloud method: From paper-based guideline to clinical decision support system.
Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():10-9. PubMed ID: 26725690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design.
Jaspers MW; Steen T; van den Bos C; Geenen M
Int J Med Inform; 2004 Nov; 73(11-12):781-95. PubMed ID: 15491929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.
Li AC; Kannry JL; Kushniruk A; Chrimes D; McGinn TG; Edonyabo D; Mann DM
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Nov; 81(11):761-72. PubMed ID: 22456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From an expert-driven paper guideline to a user-centred decision support system: a usability comparison study.
Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23684240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study.
Peute LW; De Keizer NF; Van Der Zwan EP; Jaspers MW
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():925-9. PubMed ID: 21893881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions.
Horsky J; Schiff GD; Johnston D; Mercincavage L; Bell D; Middleton B
J Biomed Inform; 2012 Dec; 45(6):1202-16. PubMed ID: 22995208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine.
Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Ogunyemi O; Zeng Q; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Oct; 37(5):305-18. PubMed ID: 15488745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive evaluation of a physician data query tool for a national ICU registry: comparing two think aloud variants and their application in redesign.
Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Jaspers MW
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):309-13. PubMed ID: 20841699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines.
Boxwala AA; Peleg M; Tu S; Ogunyemi O; Zeng QT; Wang D; Patel VL; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Jun; 37(3):147-61. PubMed ID: 15196480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Advice on guidelines: planning for guideline development in the Netherlands].
van Everdingen JJ; Dreesens DH; Tuut MK
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1599. PubMed ID: 20298622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Encoding a clinical practice guideline using guideline interchange format: a case study of a depression screening and management guideline.
Choi J; Currie LM; Wang D; Bakken S
Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76 Suppl 2():S302-7. PubMed ID: 17600762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitating access to laboratory guidelines by modeling their contents and designing a computerized user interface.
Yasini M; Duclos C; Lamy JB; Venot A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():487-91. PubMed ID: 21893797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of cognitive methods in analyzing clinicians' task behavior.
Jaspers MW; Steen T; Van Den Bos C; Geenen M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 93():25-31. PubMed ID: 15058410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: the CHICA system.
Anand V; Biondich PG; Liu G; Rosenman M; Downs SM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):187-91. PubMed ID: 15360800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From clinical requirement to personalized wellness decision support: a data-driven framework for computer-supported guideline refinement.
Hsueh PY; Lan CW; Deng V; Zhu X
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():457-61. PubMed ID: 22874232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating provider adherence in a trial of a guideline-based decision support system for hypertension.
Chan AS; Coleman RW; Martins SB; Advani A; Musen MA; Bosworth HB; Oddone EZ; Shlipak MG; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):125-9. PubMed ID: 15360788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using multi-perspective methodologies to study users' interactions with the prototype front end of a guideline-based decision support system for diabetic foot care.
Peleg M; Shachak A; Wang D; Karnieli E
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Jul; 78(7):482-93. PubMed ID: 19328739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elicitating patient patterns of physician non-compliance with breast cancer guidelines using formal concept analysis.
Bouaud J; Messai N; Laouénan C; Mentré F; Séroussi B
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():477-81. PubMed ID: 22874236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
