BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22875649)

  • 1. Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype.
    Deyarmin B; Kane JL; Valente AL; van Laar R; Gallagher C; Shriver CD; Ellsworth RE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 22875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.
    de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis.
    Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical characteristics and survival in the operable breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes].
    Zhang HM; Zhang BN; Xuan LX; Zhao P
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 31(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 19950556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
    Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ductal invasive mammary carcinoma--clinicopathological prognostic factors related to immunohistochemical expression of hormonal receptors and Her2/neu oncoprotein.
    Recăreanu F; Simionescu C; Georgescu CV; Pirici E
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(3 Suppl):1059-64. PubMed ID: 22119825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microarray-based determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status in breast cancer.
    Roepman P; Horlings HM; Krijgsman O; Kok M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Bender R; Linn SC; Glas AM; van de Vijver MJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Nov; 15(22):7003-11. PubMed ID: 19887485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apoptosis-, proliferation, immune function-, and drug resistance- related genes in ER positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer.
    Kolacinska A; Chalubinska J; Zawlik I; Szymanska B; Borowska-Garganisz E; Nowik M; Fendler W; Kubiak R; Pawlowska Z; Morawiec Z; Szemraj J
    Neoplasma; 2012; 59(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 22489698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004.
    Parise CA; Bauer KR; Brown MM; Caggiano V
    Breast J; 2009; 15(6):593-602. PubMed ID: 19764994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of subtypes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2--positive breast cancer reveals a gene signature prognostic of outcome.
    Staaf J; Ringnér M; Vallon-Christersson J; Jönsson G; Bendahl PO; Holm K; Arason A; Gunnarsson H; Hegardt C; Agnarsson BA; Luts L; Grabau D; Fernö M; Malmström PO; Johannsson OT; Loman N; Barkardottir RB; Borg A
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1813-20. PubMed ID: 20231686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry.
    Park S; Koo JS; Kim MS; Park HS; Lee JS; Lee JS; Kim SI; Park BW
    Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21865043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases.
    Bhargava R; Beriwal S; Dabbs DJ; Ozbek U; Soran A; Johnson RR; Brufsky AM; Lembersky BC; Ahrendt GM
    Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 20131351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relevance of intrinsic subtype to clinicopathological features and prognosis in 4,266 Japanese women with breast cancer.
    Shibuta K; Ueo H; Furusawa H; Komaki K; Rai Y; Sagara Y; Kamada Y; Tamaki N
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20571962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Park S; Park HS; Koo JS; Yang WI; Kim SI; Park BW
    Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 21800290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer: a 9-year study at Princess Noorah Oncology Center, Saudi Arabia.
    Satti MB
    Histopathology; 2011 Sep; 59(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 21668473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immunohistochemical characterization of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: a study from North India.
    Verma S; Bal A; Joshi K; Arora S; Singh G
    APMIS; 2012 Dec; 120(12):1008-19. PubMed ID: 23030684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Livasy CA; Perou CM; Karaca G; Cowan DW; Maia D; Jackson S; Tse CK; Nyante S; Millikan RC
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Feb; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 17234468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.