These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22875649)
1. Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Deyarmin B; Kane JL; Valente AL; van Laar R; Gallagher C; Shriver CD; Ellsworth RE Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 22875649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response. de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics. Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis. Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical characteristics and survival in the operable breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes]. Zhang HM; Zhang BN; Xuan LX; Zhao P Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 31(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 19950556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial. Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal invasive mammary carcinoma--clinicopathological prognostic factors related to immunohistochemical expression of hormonal receptors and Her2/neu oncoprotein. Recăreanu F; Simionescu C; Georgescu CV; Pirici E Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(3 Suppl):1059-64. PubMed ID: 22119825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microarray-based determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status in breast cancer. Roepman P; Horlings HM; Krijgsman O; Kok M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Bender R; Linn SC; Glas AM; van de Vijver MJ Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Nov; 15(22):7003-11. PubMed ID: 19887485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apoptosis-, proliferation, immune function-, and drug resistance- related genes in ER positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer. Kolacinska A; Chalubinska J; Zawlik I; Szymanska B; Borowska-Garganisz E; Nowik M; Fendler W; Kubiak R; Pawlowska Z; Morawiec Z; Szemraj J Neoplasma; 2012; 59(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 22489698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004. Parise CA; Bauer KR; Brown MM; Caggiano V Breast J; 2009; 15(6):593-602. PubMed ID: 19764994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of subtypes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2--positive breast cancer reveals a gene signature prognostic of outcome. Staaf J; Ringnér M; Vallon-Christersson J; Jönsson G; Bendahl PO; Holm K; Arason A; Gunnarsson H; Hegardt C; Agnarsson BA; Luts L; Grabau D; Fernö M; Malmström PO; Johannsson OT; Loman N; Barkardottir RB; Borg A J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1813-20. PubMed ID: 20231686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry. Park S; Koo JS; Kim MS; Park HS; Lee JS; Lee JS; Kim SI; Park BW Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21865043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization. Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases. Bhargava R; Beriwal S; Dabbs DJ; Ozbek U; Soran A; Johnson RR; Brufsky AM; Lembersky BC; Ahrendt GM Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 20131351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relevance of intrinsic subtype to clinicopathological features and prognosis in 4,266 Japanese women with breast cancer. Shibuta K; Ueo H; Furusawa H; Komaki K; Rai Y; Sagara Y; Kamada Y; Tamaki N Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20571962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Park S; Park HS; Koo JS; Yang WI; Kim SI; Park BW Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 21800290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer: a 9-year study at Princess Noorah Oncology Center, Saudi Arabia. Satti MB Histopathology; 2011 Sep; 59(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 21668473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunohistochemical characterization of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: a study from North India. Verma S; Bal A; Joshi K; Arora S; Singh G APMIS; 2012 Dec; 120(12):1008-19. PubMed ID: 23030684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Livasy CA; Perou CM; Karaca G; Cowan DW; Maia D; Jackson S; Tse CK; Nyante S; Millikan RC Hum Pathol; 2007 Feb; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 17234468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]