138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22875664)
1. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility.
Choi S; Chan SS; Sahota DS; Leung TY
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22875664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.
Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New Method to Measure the Subpubic Arch Angle Using 3-D Ultrasound.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Martelli F; Montaguti E; Krsmanovic J; Pacella G; Pilu G; Rizzo N; Gabrielli S
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 25871360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women.
Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of retropubic tissue thickness using intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to assess cephalopelvic disproportion.
Chor CM; Chan WYW; Tse WTA; Sahota DS
Ultrasonography; 2018 Jul; 37(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 29190877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Manual Measurements: Intraoperator and Interoperator Agreements Under A Strict Protocol in a Large Sample.
Plasencia-Martínez JM; García-Santos JM; Lozano-Herrero J; Hernández-Vidal MJ
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 27575841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility in the ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.
Kiddee W; Horattanareung O
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 May; 92(5):672-6. PubMed ID: 19459530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal Changes of Subpubic Arch Angle throughout Pregnancy.
Martelli F; Youssef A; Capogna MV; Bruno A; Bruno V; Dodaro MG; Ticconi C; Ghi T; Piccione E; Pietropolli A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 31747672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomographic study of anatomical relationship between pubic symphysis and ischial spines to improve interpretation of intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F; Patat F; Brunereau L; Simon EG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):779-785. PubMed ID: 26678354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The subpubic angle in sex determination: anthropometric measurements and analyses on Anatolian Caucasians using multidetector computed tomography datasets.
Karakas HM; Harma A; Alicioglu B
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1004-9. PubMed ID: 24237808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor.
Youssef A; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Maroni E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 24006290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphometric Study of Subpubic Angle in Human Fetuses.
Haque M; Faruqi NA; Yunus SM
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jan; 10(1):AC01-4. PubMed ID: 26894049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning process for performing and analyzing 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging and interobserver reliability study.
Siafarikas F; Staer-Jensen J; Braekken IH; Bø K; Engh ME
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22605574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of postpartum symphysis pubis distention with 3D ultrasonography: a novel method.
Aydın S; Bakar RZ; Aydın ÇA; Özcan P
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 26995568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: Development and evaluation of a standardized technique to assess blood perfusion in teats of dairy cows using power Doppler ultrasonography.
Wieland M; Scholbach TM; Shirky S; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Cheong SH; Porter IR
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Oct; 102(10):9488-9494. PubMed ID: 31421876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperator and interoperator repeatability of manual and semi-automated measurement of increased fetal nuchal translucency according to the operator's experience.
Kagan KO; Abele H; Yazdi B; Böer B; Pintoffl K; Wright D; Hoopmann M
Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1229-33. PubMed ID: 22024964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
