These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2287613)

  • 41. Evaluation of shear bond strength, penetration ability, microleakage and remineralisation capacity of glass ionomer-based fissure sealants.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 26949234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison between two glass-ionomer sealants placed using finger pressure (ART approach) and a ball burnisher.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; Mulder J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 16838480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of a glass ionomer cement used as a pit and fissure sealant in recently erupted permanent first molars.
    Barja-Fidalgo F; Maroun S; de Oliveira BH
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An in vitro investigation to optimize the quality of compomer-based fissure sealants.
    Reinhardt R; Wang A; Kaltschmitt J; Koch MJ; Pioch T; Staehle HJ; Schulte A
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 15301211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2002 Apr; 52(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 12013252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relative caries experience of sealed versus unsealed permanent posterior teeth: a three-year study.
    Messer LB; Cline JT
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 6991560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Occlusal caries formation in vitro: comparison of resin-modified glass ionomer with fluoride-releasing sealant.
    Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 11314417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Inhibition of mineral loss at the enamel/sealant interface of fissures sealed with fluoride- and non-fluoride containing dental materials in vitro.
    Kantovitz KR; Pascon FM; Correr GM; Borges AF; Uchôa MN; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 17123915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative analysis of tensile bond strength of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques.
    Dhar V; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1999 Jun; 17(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 10863491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Papacchini F; Goracci C; Sadek FT; Monticelli F; Garcia-Godoy F; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 15935265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique.
    Smales RJ; Gao W; Ho FT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
    Pereira AC; Pardi V; Mialhe FL; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Retention and effectiveness of fissure sealants in Kuwaiti school children.
    Francis R; Mascarenhas AK; Soparkar P; Al-Mutawaa S
    Community Dent Health; 2008 Dec; 25(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 19149297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries.
    Poulsen S; Laurberg L; Vaeth M; Jensen U; Haubek D
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 34(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16423029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surface protection for newly erupting first molars.
    Antonson SA; Wanuck J; Antonson DE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Jan; 27(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16454015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Early loss of pit and fissure sealant: a clinical and SEM study.
    Futatsuki M; Kubota K; Yeh YC; Park K; Moss SJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 7577741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A 48-month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed with different adhesive systems.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Tuncer D; Firat E; Unluer S; Baseren M
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 23210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.