139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22876165)
1. Combined performance of physical examination, mammography, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening among Chinese women: a follow-up study.
Huang Y; Kang M; Li H; Li JY; Zhang JY; Liu LH; Liu XT; Zhao Y; Wang Q; Li CC; Lee H
Curr Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(Suppl 2):eS22-30. PubMed ID: 22876165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities for breast cancer among Chinese women].
Kang M; Zhao Y; Huang Y; Li J; Liu L; Li H
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 36(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 24785288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang L; Wang S; Zhang L; Sheng C; Song F; Wang P; Huang Y
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):499. PubMed ID: 32487106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Breast Cancer Risk Predictive Models and Screening Strategies for Chinese Women.
Zhao Y; Xiong P; McCullough LE; Miller EE; Li H; Huang Y; Zhao M; Wang MJ; Kang M; Wang Q; Li JY
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Mar; 26(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 28263689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and evaluation of the screening performance of a low-cost high-risk screening strategy for breast cancer.
Huang Y; Wang H; Lyu Z; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Song F; Chen K
Cancer Biol Med; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1375-84. PubMed ID: 34570443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.
Lehman CD; Isaacs C; Schnall MD; Pisano ED; Ascher SM; Weatherall PT; Bluemke DA; Bowen DJ; Marcom PK; Armstrong DK; Domchek SM; Tomlinson G; Skates SJ; Gatsonis C
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 17641362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
El Saghir NS
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.
Skaane P; Skjennald A; Young K; Egge E; Jebsen I; Sager EM; Scheel B; Søvik E; Ertzaas AK; Hofvind S; Abdelnoor M
Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.
Hwang JY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam MY
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 26256979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
