These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22877514)

  • 21. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The late Nd reflects a memory trace containing amodal spatial information.
    Meehan S; Singhal A; Fowler B
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 16176375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An investigation into the temporal dimension of the Mozart effect: evidence from the attentional blink task.
    Ho C; Mason O; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 16942739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of blinks and saccadic eye movements on visual reaction times.
    Johns M; Crowley K; Chapman R; Tucker A; Hocking C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):783-8. PubMed ID: 19429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term cognitive and behavioural follow-up in three patients with eye closure-triggered paroxysmal activity.
    Termine C; Teutonico F; Balottin U; Fasce M; Ferri M; Perna S; Piccinelli P; Rubboli G; Veggiotti P
    Epileptic Disord; 2008 Mar; 10(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 18367428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phase synchronization analysis of EEG during attentional blink.
    Nakatani C; Ito J; Nikolaev AR; Gong P; van Leeuwen C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1969-79. PubMed ID: 16356332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Employing an active mental task to enhance the performance of auditory attention-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Xu H; Zhang D; Ouyang M; Hong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22854211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.
    Nebel K; Wiese H; Stude P; de Greiff A; Diener HC; Keidel M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):760-76. PubMed ID: 16337110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An event-related potential study of temporal information encoding and decision making.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Yang B; Jackson T; Peng C; Yuan H; Liu C
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jan; 21(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 20010443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of attention on cortical processing of sound motion: an EEG study.
    Kreitewolf J; Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2340-9. PubMed ID: 20965256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. OSP parameters and the cognitive component of reaction time to a missing stimulus: linking brain and behavior.
    Hernández OH; Vogel-Sprott M
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19501943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variable foreperiod deficits in Parkinson's disease: dissociation across reflexive and voluntary behaviors.
    Jurkowski AJ; Stepp E; Hackley SA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jun; 58(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15878726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Chatterjee A; Sturm W; Willmes K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19878913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.
    Basile LF; Brunetti EP; Pereira JF; Ballester G; Amaro E; Anghinah R; Ribeiro P; Piedade R; Gattaz WF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16313987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spontaneous eye blinks are entrained by finger tapping.
    Cong DK; Sharikadze M; Staude G; Deubel H; Wolf W
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Feb; 29(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19913931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.
    Codispoti M; Ferrari V; Junghöfer M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 16750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spontaneous eyeblink rate predicts the strength of visuomotor binding.
    Colzato LS; van Wouwe NC; Hommel B
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2387-92. PubMed ID: 17433381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prepare for conflict: EEG correlates of the anticipation of target competition during overt and covert shifts of visual attention.
    Kelly SP; Foxe JJ; Newman G; Edelman JA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(9):1690-700. PubMed ID: 20525082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.