BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22878341)

  • 1. Dietary intake measured from a self-administered, online 24-hour recall system compared with 4-day diet records in an adult US population.
    Frankenfeld CL; Poudrier JK; Waters NM; Gillevet PM; Xu Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Oct; 112(10):1642-7. PubMed ID: 22878341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of self-reported dietary intake at school meals by American Indian children: the Pathways Study.
    Weber JL; Lytle L; Gittelsohn J; Cunningham-Sabo L; Heller K; Anliker JA; Stevens J; Hurley J; Ring K
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 May; 104(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 15127059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a Diet Quality Screener for Global Use: Evaluation in a Sample of US Women.
    Kronsteiner-Gicevic S; Mou Y; Bromage S; Fung TT; Willett W
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 May; 121(5):854-871.e6. PubMed ID: 33602635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a three-day estimated food record, a 72-hour recall and a food-frequency questionnaire for dietary assessment in a Mediterranean Spanish population.
    Schröder H; Covas MI; Marrugat J; Vila J; Pena A; Alcántara M; Masiá R
    Clin Nutr; 2001 Oct; 20(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 11534938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Thompson FE; George SM; Subar AF
    J Nutr; 2016 Dec; 146(12):2567-2573. PubMed ID: 27807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the relative validity of a web-based self-administered 24-hour dietary recall in a Canadian adolescent's population.
    Drapeau V; Laramée C; Lafreniere J; Trottier C; Brochu C; Robitaille J; Lamarche B; Lemieux S
    Nutr J; 2024 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 38907225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of Diet Quality across Calendar and Winter Holiday Seasons among Midlife Women: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall.
    Jahns L; Johnson LK; Scheett AJ; Stote KS; Raatz SK; Subar AF; Tande D
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Dec; 116(12):1961-1969. PubMed ID: 27618574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dietary intake in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a comparison of dietary assessment methods.
    Hendricks K; Tang A; Spiegelman D; Skinner S; Woods M
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 15800553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The feasibility of personal digital assistants (PDAs) to collect dietary intake data in low-income pregnant women.
    Fowles ER; Gentry B
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 18984494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) Food Checklist: a self-report instrument to measure fat and sodium intake by middle school students.
    Smith KW; Hoelscher DM; Lytle LA; Dwyer JT; Nicklas TA; Zive MM; Clesi AL; Garceau AO; Stone EJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Jun; 101(6):635-47. PubMed ID: 11424542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diet quality of preschoolers in Greece based on the Healthy Eating Index: the GENESIS study.
    Manios Y; Kourlaba G; Kondaki K; Grammatikaki E; Birbilis M; Oikonomou E; Roma-Giannikou E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Apr; 109(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 19328256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2005.
    Guenther PM; Reedy J; Krebs-Smith SM; Reeve BB
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Nov; 108(11):1854-64. PubMed ID: 18954575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
    Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for assessment of calcium and bone-related nutrient intake in rural populations.
    Osowski JM; Beare T; Specker B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Aug; 107(8):1349-55. PubMed ID: 17659902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Diet ID Platform to the Automated Self-administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool for Assessment of Dietary Intake.
    Turner-McGrievy G; Hutto B; Bernhart JA; Wilson MJ
    J Am Nutr Assoc; 2022; 41(4):360-382. PubMed ID: 33705267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underreporting of energy intake in Brazilian women varies according to dietary assessment: a cross-sectional study using doubly labeled water.
    Scagliusi FB; Ferriolli E; Pfrimer K; Laureano C; Cunha CS; Gualano B; Lourenço BH; Lancha AH
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Dec; 108(12):2031-40. PubMed ID: 19027406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study: advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records.
    Buzzard IM; Faucett CL; Jeffery RW; McBane L; McGovern P; Baxter JS; Shapiro AC; Blackburn GL; Chlebowski RT; Elashoff RM; Wynder EL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1996 Jun; 96(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 8655904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement in participant-coded and investigator-coded food-record analysis in overweight research participants: an examination of interpretation bias.
    Bjorge-Schohl B; Johnston CS; Trier CM; Fleming KR
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 May; 114(5):796-801. PubMed ID: 24210517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.