These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22879131)

  • 1. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: temperature effect on competitive ability and fitness components.
    Montchamp-Moreau C
    Genet Sel Evol (1983); 1983; 15(3):367-78. PubMed ID: 22879131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetics and the environment in interspecific competition: a study using the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    Hedrick PW; King E
    Oecologia; 1996 Oct; 108(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 28307735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Interspecific Competition on the Dynamics of a Polymorphism in an Experimental Population of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
    Clark A
    Genetics; 1979 Aug; 92(4):1315-28. PubMed ID: 17248954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations.
    Barker JS
    Oecologia; 1971 Jun; 8(2):139-156. PubMed ID: 28313277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecological and genetic interactions in Drosophila-parasitoids communities: a case study with D. melanogaster, D. simulans and their common Leptopilina parasitoids in south-eastern France.
    Fleury F; Ris N; Allemand R; Fouillet P; Carton Y; Boulétreau M
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):181-94. PubMed ID: 15088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. THE GENETIC BASIS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS.
    Welbergen P; van Dijken FR; Scharloo W; Köhler W
    Evolution; 1992 Oct; 46(5):1385-1398. PubMed ID: 28568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of Fitness and Its Components in Six Laboratory Strains of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
    Yamazaki T
    Genetics; 1984 Sep; 108(1):201-11. PubMed ID: 17246227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indirect evidence of alteration in the expression of the rDNA genes in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    Granadino B; Penalva LO; Sánchez L
    Mol Gen Genet; 1996 Jan; 250(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 8569692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA.
    Joshi A; Thompson JN
    Evolution; 1995 Aug; 49(4):616-625. PubMed ID: 28565141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence.
    Aquadro CF; Lado KM; Noon WA
    Genetics; 1988 Aug; 119(4):875-88. PubMed ID: 2900794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Martín-Campos JM; Comerón JM; Miyashita N; Aguadé M
    Genetics; 1992 Apr; 130(4):805-16. PubMed ID: 1582559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temperature-Dependent Competitive Outcomes between the Fruit Flies
    Comeault AA; Matute DR
    Am Nat; 2021 Mar; 197(3):312-323. PubMed ID: 33625962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolation of protease-free alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) from Drosophila simulans and several homozygous and heterozygous Drosophila melanogaster variants.
    Smilda T; Lamme DA; Collu G; Jekel PA; Reinders P; Beintema JJ
    Biochem Genet; 1998 Feb; 36(1-2):15-36. PubMed ID: 9562904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Light-dependent pupation site preferences in Drosophila. II. Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    Manning M; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 1981 Nov; 11(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 6803758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulatory aspects of esterase 6 activity variation in sibling Drosophila species.
    Karotam J; Oakeshott JG
    Heredity (Edinb); 1993 Jul; 71 ( Pt 1)():41-50. PubMed ID: 8360077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic basis of the difference in alcohol dehydrogenase expression between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    Laurie CC; Heath EM; Jacobson JW; Thomson MS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1990 Dec; 87(24):9674-8. PubMed ID: 2124699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interspecific DNA transformation in Drosophila.
    Scavarda NJ; Hartl DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1984 Dec; 81(23):7515-9. PubMed ID: 6095302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition Between Drosophila Melanogaster and Drosophila Simulans: II. The Improvement of Competitive Ability Through Selection.
    Moore JA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1952 Sep; 38(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 16589182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in response to selection for competitive ability.
    Aiken RB; Gibo DL
    Oecologia; 1979 Oct; 43(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 28309828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loss of notum macrochaetae as an interspecific hybrid anomaly between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Takano TS
    Genetics; 1998 Jul; 149(3):1435-50. PubMed ID: 9649532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.