BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22879447)

  • 1. Determinants of success of quality improvement collaboratives: what does the literature show?
    Hulscher ME; Schouten LM; Grol RP; Buchan H
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 22879447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining variation in perceived team effectiveness: results from eleven quality improvement collaboratives.
    Strating MM; Nieboer AP
    J Clin Nurs; 2013 Jun; 22(11-12):1692-706. PubMed ID: 22612406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality improvement in long-term mental health: results from four collaboratives.
    Strating MM; Broer T; van Rooijen S; Bal RA; Nieboer AP
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Jun; 19(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 22070667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.
    Zamboni K; Baker U; Tyagi M; Schellenberg J; Hill Z; Hanson C
    Implement Sci; 2020 May; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 32366269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.
    Wells S; Tamir O; Gray J; Naidoo D; Bekhit M; Goldmann D
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Mar; 27(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 29055899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with constructive staff-family relationships in the care of older adults in the institutional setting.
    Haesler E; Bauer M; Nay R
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2006 Dec; 4(4):288-336. PubMed ID: 21631773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study.
    Versteeg MH; Laurant MG; Franx GC; Jacobs AJ; Wensing MJ
    Implement Sci; 2012 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 22230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do quality improvement collaboratives' educational components match the dominant learning style preferences of the participants?
    Weggelaar-Jansen AM; van Wijngaarden J; Slaghuis SS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jun; 15():239. PubMed ID: 26087653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data-possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time.
    Algurén B; Nordin A; Andersson-Gäre B; Peterson A
    Implement Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(1):74. PubMed ID: 31337394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transferring skills in quality collaboratives focused on improving patient logistics.
    Weggelaar-Jansen AM; van Wijngaarden J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):224. PubMed ID: 29606124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare - a nationwide case study.
    Brandrud AS; Nyen B; Hjortdahl P; Sandvik L; Helljesen Haldorsen GS; Bergli M; Nelson EC; Bretthauer M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Sep; 17(1):648. PubMed ID: 28903723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.
    Knight AW; Tam CWM; Dennis S; Fraser J; Pond D
    BMJ Open Qual; 2022 May; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 35589275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.
    Brennan SE; Bosch M; Buchan H; Green SE
    Implement Sci; 2013 Feb; 8():20. PubMed ID: 23410500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Promise and challenges of maternal health collaboratives.
    Louis JM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 25851849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme.
    McGowan JG; Martin GP; Krapohl GL; Campbell DA; Englesbe MJ; Dimick JB; Dixon-Woods M
    BMJ Open; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e076648. PubMed ID: 38097243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study.
    Strating MM; Nieboer AP; Zuiderent-Jerak T; Bal RA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Apr; 20(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 21270070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning Collaboratives: Insights And A New Taxonomy From AHRQ's Two Decades Of Experience.
    Nix M; McNamara P; Genevro J; Vargas N; Mistry K; Fournier A; Shofer M; Lomotan E; Miller T; Ricciardi R; Bierman AS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2018 Feb; 37(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 29401014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.
    Nadeem E; Olin SS; Hill LC; Hoagwood KE; Horwitz SM
    Milbank Q; 2013 Jun; 91(2):354-94. PubMed ID: 23758514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.