These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22880455)

  • 1. [Quality control testing of x-ray equipment used in medical diagnostic: results of interlaboratory comparison].
    Brodecki M; Bednarek A; Janiak P; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22880455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interlaboratory comparison and accreditation in quality control testing of diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A; Servomaa A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15933108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.
    Alvarez M; Pina DR; Miranda JR; Duarte SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7177-90. PubMed ID: 23060095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic x-ray examinations in Poland in 2004 in view of the population exposure: the assessment of structure and trends].
    Staniszewska MA; Papierz S
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17125031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eight years of quality control in Bulgaria: impact on mammography practice.
    Avramova-Cholakova S; Lilkov G; Kaneva M; Terziev K; Nakov I; Mutkurov N; Kovacheva D; Ivanova M; Vasilev D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):359-62. PubMed ID: 25836697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in screening mammography.
    Health Devices; 1990; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MQSA helps eliminate inferior mammography.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Nov; 19(11):129-32, 136. PubMed ID: 10176114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality control of mammography: potential use of a new device for testing the image quality and the dose].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Gambaccini M; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 8975313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital mammography: quality and dose control.
    Di Maggio C; Gambaccini M; Gennaro G; Baldelli P; Taibi A; Chersevani R; Aimonetto S; Rossetti V; Origgi D; Vigorito S; Contento G; Angelini L; Maggi S
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):459-73. PubMed ID: 15195008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
    Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure reduction through quality assurance for diagnostic x-ray procedures.
    Lipoti JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):577-85. PubMed ID: 18849692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.